ACX vs VELO
Across Protocol and Velodrome Finance scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
ACX scores 137 of 250 and ranks 37th of 251. VELO scores 121 and ranks 63rd. ACX leads by 16 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. ACX takes 13 of the 25 variables, VELO takes 3, and 9 are level.
2 variables separate them by 3 points or more. ACX is clear on Revenue Trend (7 against 4) and P/S Multiple (9 against 6).
Both score 3 or below on Institutional Adoption. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
VELO still has 49.1% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 29.5% for ACX. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of VELO is taking the 1.96x dilution path and a buyer of ACX the 1.42x one.
VELO is valued at $46.1M against $30.5M for ACX, a 1.5x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 6 | 5 | ACX +1 | |
| Revenue Trend | 7 | 4 | ACX +3 | |
| P/S Multiple | 9 | 6 | ACX +3 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 7 | 7 | level |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 5 | 4 | ACX +1 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 6 | 7 | VELO +1 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 7 | 5 | ACX +2 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 5 | 4 | ACX +1 | |
| Insider Selling | 6 | 5 | ACX +1 | |
| Holder Concentration | 4 | 5 | VELO +1 |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 6 | 4 | ACX +2 | |
| Active Users | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Developer Activity | 6 | 6 | level | |
| Network Growth | 5 | 4 | ACX +1 |
Position
| Market Share | 5 | 4 | ACX +1 | |
| Competitive Moat | 5 | 4 | ACX +1 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Exchange Depth | 3 | 4 | VELO +1 | |
| Social Mindshare | 4 | 4 | level |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 6 | 6 | level | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 5 | 5 | level | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 5 | 4 | ACX +1 | |
| Team Execution | 6 | 6 | level | |
| Treasury Runway | 6 | 5 | ACX +1 |
Bars read outward from the centre: ACX to the left, VELO to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| ACX | VELO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0433 | $0.0344 |
| Market cap | $30.5M | $46.1M |
| Circulating | 70.5% | 50.9% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.42x | 1.96x |
| Off all-time high | -97.4% | -91.6% |
| To recover the high | 38.5x | 11.9x |
| Total value locked | $180.0M | $180.0M |
| Network | Ethereum | Optimism |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
ACX · CAUTIOUS HOLD
Growing bridge volume, fee buyback mechanism, UMA network integration
Intent-based competition (UniswapX), relayer centralization, low liquidity
VELO · CAUTIOUS HOLD
Velodrome V3 launch with concentrated liquidity and cross-chain expansion beyond OP Mainnet
AERO is eating VELO's narrative and liquidity; OP Mainnet TVL stagnant while Base dominates Superchain
Common questions
- Is ACX or VELO the better investment?
- On this framework ACX scores higher: 137 against 121 of 250, and it is rated CAUTIOUS HOLD against CAUTIOUS HOLD. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and ACX still wins 13 of the 25 individual variables against VELO.
- What is the biggest difference between ACX and VELO?
- Revenue Trend. ACX scores 7 of 10 there and VELO scores 4, a gap of 3 points on a single variable.
- Which is bigger, ACX or VELO?
- ACX is valued at $30.5M and VELO at $46.1M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.