ARB vs PEPE
Arbitrum and Pepe scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
ARB scores 134 of 250 and ranks 42nd of 251. PEPE scores 92 and ranks 184th. ARB leads by 42 points, which is a wide enough margin that the framework is not ambivalent. ARB takes 18 of the 25 variables, PEPE takes 6, and one is level.
The framework rates ARB CAUTIOUS HOLD and PEPE PASS. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.
5 variables separate them by 3 points or more. ARB is clear on Developer Activity (8 against 1), Team Execution (7 against 1) and TVL Trend (6 against 1).
Both score 3 or below on Protocol Revenue, Buyback and Burn, Real Staking Yield. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
ARB still has 32.1% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 0% for PEPE. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of ARB is taking the 1.47x dilution path and a buyer of PEPE the 1x one.
PEPE is valued at $1.70B against $1.25B for ARB, a 1.4x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 3 | 1 | ARB +2 | |
| Revenue Trend | 5 | 1 | ARB +4 | |
| P/S Multiple | 4 | 1 | ARB +3 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 2 | 1 | ARB +1 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 4 | 6 | PEPE +2 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 3 | 6 | PEPE +3 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 5 | 8 | PEPE +3 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 3 | 1 | ARB +2 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 6 | 4 | ARB +2 | |
| Insider Selling | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Holder Concentration | 5 | 4 | ARB +1 |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 6 | 1 | ARB +5 | |
| Active Users | 7 | 5 | ARB +2 | |
| Developer Activity | 8 | 1 | ARB +7 | |
| Network Growth | 7 | 3 | ARB +4 |
Position
| Market Share | 8 | 7 | ARB +1 | |
| Competitive Moat | 5 | 4 | ARB +1 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 6 | 2 | ARB +4 | |
| Exchange Depth | 7 | 8 | PEPE +1 | |
| Social Mindshare | 6 | 8 | PEPE +2 |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 7 | 6 | ARB +1 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 6 | 3 | ARB +3 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 4 | 5 | PEPE +1 | |
| Team Execution | 7 | 1 | ARB +6 | |
| Treasury Runway | 6 | 1 | ARB +5 |
Bars read outward from the centre: ARB to the left, PEPE to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| ARB | PEPE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1840 | $0.000004 |
| Market cap | $1.25B | $1.70B |
| Circulating | 67.9% | 100% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.47x | 1x |
| Off all-time high | -92.3% | -85.6% |
| To recover the high | 13x | 6.9x |
| Total value locked | $2.20B | not published |
| Network | Arbitrum | Ethereum |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
ARB · CAUTIOUS HOLD
BOLD dispute resolution upgrade; Stylus enabling Rust/C++ smart contracts expanding developer base
42% circulating with significant investor releases remaining; sequencer revenue not well-accrued to ARB token holders
PEPE · PASS
Ethereum bull market amplification; PEPE as ETH meme equivalent to DOGE on BTC; high CEX liquidity
Zero protocol revenue or utility; 6% supply still to open from deployer wallet; pure sentiment asset; rapid drawdowns in risk-off environments
Common questions
- Is ARB or PEPE the better investment?
- On this framework ARB scores higher: 134 against 92 of 250, and it is rated CAUTIOUS HOLD against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and ARB still wins 18 of the 25 individual variables against PEPE.
- What is the biggest difference between ARB and PEPE?
- Developer Activity. ARB scores 8 of 10 there and PEPE scores 1, a gap of 7 points on a single variable.
- Which is bigger, ARB or PEPE?
- ARB is valued at $1.25B and PEPE at $1.70B on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.