ARB vs RDNT
Arbitrum and Radiant Capital scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
ARB scores 134 of 250 and ranks 42nd of 251. RDNT scores 104 and ranks 118th. ARB leads by 30 points, which is a wide enough margin that the framework is not ambivalent. ARB takes 16 of the 25 variables, RDNT takes 4, and 5 are level.
The framework rates ARB CAUTIOUS HOLD and RDNT WATCH. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.
5 variables separate them by 3 points or more. ARB is clear on Market Share (8 against 3), Active Users (7 against 4) and Developer Activity (8 against 5). RDNT is clear on Real Staking Yield (5 against 2).
Both score 3 or below on Buyback and Burn. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
ARB still has 32.1% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 4.2% for RDNT. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of ARB is taking the 1.47x dilution path and a buyer of RDNT the 1.04x one.
ARB is valued at $1.25B against $1.0M for RDNT, a 1216.4x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 | |
| Revenue Trend | 5 | 4 | ARB +1 | |
| P/S Multiple | 4 | 5 | RDNT +1 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 2 | 5 | RDNT +3 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Vesting Schedule | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Buyback and Burn | 3 | 3 | level |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 6 | 4 | ARB +2 | |
| Insider Selling | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Holder Concentration | 5 | 4 | ARB +1 |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 6 | 4 | ARB +2 | |
| Active Users | 7 | 4 | ARB +3 | |
| Developer Activity | 8 | 5 | ARB +3 | |
| Network Growth | 7 | 4 | ARB +3 |
Position
| Market Share | 8 | 3 | ARB +5 | |
| Competitive Moat | 5 | 4 | ARB +1 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 6 | 3 | ARB +3 | |
| Exchange Depth | 7 | 5 | ARB +2 | |
| Social Mindshare | 6 | 4 | ARB +2 |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 7 | 5 | ARB +2 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 6 | 4 | ARB +2 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Team Execution | 7 | 5 | ARB +2 | |
| Treasury Runway | 6 | 4 | ARB +2 |
Bars read outward from the centre: ARB to the left, RDNT to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| ARB | RDNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1840 | $0.000715 |
| Market cap | $1.25B | $1.0M |
| Circulating | 67.9% | 95.8% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.47x | 1.04x |
| Off all-time high | -92.3% | -99.88% |
| To recover the high | 13x | 833.3x |
| Total value locked | $2.20B | not published |
| Network | Arbitrum | Arbitrum |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
ARB · CAUTIOUS HOLD
BOLD dispute resolution upgrade; Stylus enabling Rust/C++ smart contracts expanding developer base
42% circulating with significant investor releases remaining; sequencer revenue not well-accrued to ARB token holders
RDNT · WATCH
Omnichain lending expansion across Arbitrum, BSC, and Ethereum; LayerZero integration drives cross-chain TVL.
Smart contract risk from cross-chain bridging; high token emissions and potential for bad debt in volatile markets.
Common questions
- Is ARB or RDNT the better investment?
- On this framework ARB scores higher: 134 against 104 of 250, and it is rated CAUTIOUS HOLD against WATCH. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and ARB still wins 16 of the 25 individual variables against RDNT.
- What is the biggest difference between ARB and RDNT?
- Market Share. ARB scores 8 of 10 there and RDNT scores 3, a gap of 5 points on a single variable.
- Which is bigger, ARB or RDNT?
- ARB is valued at $1.25B and RDNT at $1.0M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.