ARB vs VRTX
Arbitrum and Vertex Protocol scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
ARB scores 134 of 250 and ranks 42nd of 251. VRTX scores 121 and ranks 63rd. ARB leads by 13 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. ARB takes 14 of the 25 variables, VRTX takes 9, and 2 are level.
4 variables separate them by 3 points or more. ARB is clear on Market Share (8 against 4), Institutional Adoption (6 against 3) and Exchange Depth (7 against 4). VRTX is clear on Real Staking Yield (5 against 2).
VRTX still has 92.4% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 32.1% for ARB. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of VRTX is taking the 13.16x dilution path and a buyer of ARB the 1.47x one.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 3 | 5 | VRTX +2 | |
| Revenue Trend | 5 | 6 | VRTX +1 | |
| P/S Multiple | 4 | 5 | VRTX +1 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 2 | 5 | VRTX +3 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 4 | 5 | VRTX +1 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 3 | 5 | VRTX +2 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Buyback and Burn | 3 | 4 | VRTX +1 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 6 | 5 | ARB +1 | |
| Insider Selling | 4 | 5 | VRTX +1 | |
| Holder Concentration | 5 | 4 | ARB +1 |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 6 | 5 | ARB +1 | |
| Active Users | 7 | 5 | ARB +2 | |
| Developer Activity | 8 | 6 | ARB +2 | |
| Network Growth | 7 | 5 | ARB +2 |
Position
| Market Share | 8 | 4 | ARB +4 | |
| Competitive Moat | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Institutional Adoption | 6 | 3 | ARB +3 | |
| Exchange Depth | 7 | 4 | ARB +3 | |
| Social Mindshare | 6 | 4 | ARB +2 |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 7 | 5 | ARB +2 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 6 | 5 | ARB +1 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 4 | 5 | VRTX +1 | |
| Team Execution | 7 | 6 | ARB +1 | |
| Treasury Runway | 6 | 5 | ARB +1 |
Bars read outward from the centre: ARB to the left, VRTX to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| ARB | VRTX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1840 | not published |
| Market cap | $1.25B | not published |
| Circulating | 67.9% | 7.6% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.47x | 13.16x |
| Off all-time high | -92.3% | n/a |
| To recover the high | 13x | n/a |
| Total value locked | $2.20B | not published |
| Network | Arbitrum | Arbitrum |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
ARB · CAUTIOUS HOLD
BOLD dispute resolution upgrade; Stylus enabling Rust/C++ smart contracts expanding developer base
42% circulating with significant investor releases remaining; sequencer revenue not well-accrued to ARB token holders
VRTX · CAUTIOUS HOLD
Vertex's cross-margin expansion to Arbitrum Orbit chain, enabling 100x use on BTC/ETH perps in Q2 2025.
DYdX v5's isolated margin vaults on Cosmos drain 60% of Vertex's open interest within 6 months.
Common questions
- Is ARB or VRTX the better investment?
- On this framework ARB scores higher: 134 against 121 of 250, and it is rated CAUTIOUS HOLD against CAUTIOUS HOLD. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and ARB still wins 14 of the 25 individual variables against VRTX.
- What is the biggest difference between ARB and VRTX?
- Market Share. ARB scores 8 of 10 there and VRTX scores 4, a gap of 4 points on a single variable.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.