CTSI vs PEAQ
Cartesi and peaq scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
CTSI scores 96 of 250 and ranks 161st of 251. PEAQ scores 88 and ranks 199th. CTSI leads by 8 points, which is inside the range where the individual variables matter more than the total. CTSI takes 10 of the 25 variables, PEAQ takes 2, and 13 are level.
No single variable separates CTSI and PEAQ by as much as 3 points. They are close on the framework's terms, which makes price, liquidity and the supply position below the only grounds for choosing.
Both score 3 or below on Protocol Revenue, Buyback and Burn, Real Staking Yield, Active Users, Market Share, Institutional Adoption and 2 more. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
PEAQ still has 54.7% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 4.7% for CTSI. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of PEAQ is taking the 2.21x dilution path and a buyer of CTSI the 1.05x one.
PEAQ is valued at $102.2M against $27.7M for CTSI, a 3.7x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 2 | 2 | level | |
| Revenue Trend | 3 | 4 | PEAQ +1 | |
| P/S Multiple | 4 | 3 | CTSI +1 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 3 | 3 | level |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 5 | 4 | CTSI +1 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 5 | 4 | CTSI +1 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 5 | 4 | CTSI +1 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 2 | 2 | level |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Insider Selling | 5 | 4 | CTSI +1 | |
| Holder Concentration | 4 | 4 | level |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 3 | 4 | PEAQ +1 | |
| Active Users | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Developer Activity | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Network Growth | 4 | 4 | level |
Position
| Market Share | 3 | 2 | CTSI +1 | |
| Competitive Moat | 4 | 3 | CTSI +1 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Exchange Depth | 4 | 3 | CTSI +1 | |
| Social Mindshare | 3 | 3 | level |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 4 | 4 | level | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Team Execution | 5 | 4 | CTSI +1 | |
| Treasury Runway | 5 | 4 | CTSI +1 |
Bars read outward from the centre: CTSI to the left, PEAQ to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| CTSI | PEAQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0290 | $0.0398 |
| Market cap | $27.7M | $102.2M |
| Circulating | 95.3% | 45.3% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.05x | 2.21x |
| Off all-time high | -98.3% | -94.7% |
| To recover the high | 58.8x | 18.9x |
| Total value locked | not published | not published |
| Network | Ethereum | peaq |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
CTSI · PASS
Cartesi Rollups mainnet launch enabling Linux-based DApp development
Slow developer adoption vs. EVM-compatible L2s like Arbitrum/Optimism
PEAQ · PASS
DePIN network growth; real-world asset tokenization partnerships.
Early-stage adoption; competition from IoT blockchains like Helium.
Common questions
- Is CTSI or PEAQ the better investment?
- On this framework CTSI scores higher: 96 against 88 of 250, and it is rated PASS against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and CTSI still wins 10 of the 25 individual variables against PEAQ.
- What is the biggest difference between CTSI and PEAQ?
- Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
- Which is bigger, CTSI or PEAQ?
- CTSI is valued at $27.7M and PEAQ at $102.2M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.