Similar fundamental profile

FTM vs KSM

Fantom and Kusama scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.

Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.

FTM score
111/250
91st of 251 · WATCH
KSM score
103/250
124th of 251 · WATCH
Variables won
8 to 0
17 level of 25
Framework prefers
FTM
by 8 points
01

What separates them

FTM scores 111 of 250 and ranks 91st of 251. KSM scores 103 and ranks 124th. FTM leads by 8 points, which is inside the range where the individual variables matter more than the total. FTM takes 8 of the 25 variables, KSM takes 0, and 17 are level.

No single variable separates FTM and KSM by as much as 3 points. They are close on the framework's terms, which makes price, liquidity and the supply position below the only grounds for choosing.

Both score 3 or below on Protocol Revenue, Buyback and Burn, Market Share. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.

02

All 25 variables, head to head

Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.

Cash flow

Cash flow variables compared between FTM and KSM
Protocol Revenue3
2FTM +1
Revenue Trend4
3FTM +1
P/S Multiple4
4level
Real Staking Yield5
5level

Supply

Supply variables compared between FTM and KSM
Supply Inflation5
5level
Vesting Schedule6
6level
Circulating / FDV Ratio7
7level
Buyback and Burn3
2FTM +1

Ownership

Ownership variables compared between FTM and KSM
Smart Money Flows4
4level
Insider Selling5
5level
Holder Concentration4
4level

Traction

Traction variables compared between FTM and KSM
TVL Trend4
3FTM +1
Active Users4
3FTM +1
Developer Activity5
5level
Network Growth4
4level

Position

Position variables compared between FTM and KSM
Market Share3
3level
Competitive Moat4
4level
Institutional Adoption4
3FTM +1
Exchange Depth6
5FTM +1
Social Mindshare4
4level

Risk

Risk variables compared between FTM and KSM
Regulatory Safety5
5level
Catalyst Calendar4
3FTM +1
BTC Alpha Potential4
4level
Team Execution5
5level
Treasury Runway5
5level

Bars read outward from the centre: FTM to the left, KSM to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.

03

Market and supply

Market and supply figures for FTM and KSM
FTMKSM
Price$0.0334$4.78
Market capnot published$90.6M
Circulatingn/a100%
Dilution to full supplyn/a1x
Off all-time high-99.03%-99.23%
To recover the high103.1x129.9x
Total value lockednot publishednot published
NetworkFantomKusama

Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.

04

Catalyst and risk on each side

FTM · WATCH

Catalyst

Sonic upgrade (Fantom) promises faster finality and EVM compatibility; network migration.

Principal risk

Delays in Sonic mainnet launch; low TVL vs. rival L1s; reliance on DeFi revival.

KSM · WATCH

Catalyst

Polkadot parachain auctions and cross-chain interoperability; Kusama as experimental sandbox for new dApps.

Principal risk

High inflation from parachain rewards; limited DeFi TVL and developer activity vs. Ethereum network.

05

Common questions

Is FTM or KSM the better investment?
On this framework FTM scores higher: 111 against 103 of 250, and it is rated WATCH against WATCH. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and FTM still wins 8 of the 25 individual variables against KSM.
What is the biggest difference between FTM and KSM?
Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
06

Related comparisons

Keep reading

Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.