MASK vs SUPER
Mask Network and SuperVerse scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
MASK scores 82 of 250 and ranks 216th of 251. SUPER scores 67 and ranks 238th. MASK leads by 15 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. MASK takes 15 of the 25 variables, SUPER takes 1, and 9 are level.
No single variable separates MASK and SUPER by as much as 3 points. The lead is broad rather than concentrated: MASK is ahead on 15 of 25 variables by one or two points each, which is what produces the composite gap without any one variable carrying it.
Both score 3 or below on Protocol Revenue, Revenue Trend, Vesting Schedule, Buyback and Burn, Smart Money Flows, Insider Selling and 11 more. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
SUPER still has 35% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 0% for MASK. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of SUPER is taking the 1.54x dilution path and a buyer of MASK the 1x one.
SUPER is valued at $144.5M against $45.8M for MASK, a 3.2x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 2 | 1 | MASK +1 | |
| Revenue Trend | 2 | 1 | MASK +1 | |
| P/S Multiple | 5 | 3 | MASK +2 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 2 | 2 | level |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 3 | 4 | SUPER +1 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 6 | 5 | MASK +1 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 2 | 2 | level |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 3 | 2 | MASK +1 | |
| Insider Selling | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Holder Concentration | 3 | 3 | level |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 2 | 1 | MASK +1 | |
| Active Users | 3 | 2 | MASK +1 | |
| Developer Activity | 4 | 3 | MASK +1 | |
| Network Growth | 3 | 2 | MASK +1 |
Position
| Market Share | 3 | 2 | MASK +1 | |
| Competitive Moat | 3 | 2 | MASK +1 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 3 | 2 | MASK +1 | |
| Exchange Depth | 5 | 4 | MASK +1 | |
| Social Mindshare | 4 | 4 | level |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 3 | 3 | level | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Team Execution | 3 | 2 | MASK +1 | |
| Treasury Runway | 4 | 3 | MASK +1 |
Bars read outward from the centre: MASK to the left, SUPER to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| MASK | SUPER | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4585 | $0.2222 |
| Market cap | $45.8M | $144.5M |
| Circulating | 100% | 65% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1x | 1.54x |
| Off all-time high | -98.9% | -95.3% |
| To recover the high | 90.9x | 21.3x |
| Total value locked | not published | not published |
| Network | Ethereum | Ethereum |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
MASK · PASS
X (Twitter) and Farcaster integrations driving decentralized social narrative
Product-market fit never proven; large outstanding supply releases from team and investors
SUPER · PASS
SuperVerse metaverse game launch attracting P2E players
Gaming/metaverse sector in prolonged bear market; no active games generating revenue; team credibility issues
Common questions
- Is MASK or SUPER the better investment?
- On this framework MASK scores higher: 82 against 67 of 250, and it is rated PASS against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and MASK still wins 15 of the 25 individual variables against SUPER.
- What is the biggest difference between MASK and SUPER?
- Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
- Which is bigger, MASK or SUPER?
- MASK is valued at $45.8M and SUPER at $144.5M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.