Similar fundamental profile

MINA vs OLAS

Mina Protocol and Olas (Autonolas) scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.

Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.

MINA score
98/250
150th of 251 · PASS
OLAS score
129/250
46th of 251 · CAUTIOUS HOLD
Variables won
2 to 19
4 level of 25
Framework prefers
OLAS
by 31 points
01

What separates them

MINA scores 98 of 250 and ranks 150th of 251. OLAS scores 129 and ranks 46th. OLAS leads by 31 points, which is a wide enough margin that the framework is not ambivalent. MINA takes 2 of the 25 variables, OLAS takes 19, and 4 are level.

The framework rates MINA PASS and OLAS CAUTIOUS HOLD. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.

3 variables separate them by 3 points or more. OLAS is clear on Revenue Trend (5 against 2), Supply Inflation (5 against 2) and Buyback and Burn (4 against 1).

OLAS still has 36.8% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 0% for MINA. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of OLAS is taking the 1.58x dilution path and a buyer of MINA the 1x one.

MINA is valued at $121.4M against $13.4M for OLAS, a 9.1x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.

02

All 25 variables, head to head

Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.

Cash flow

Cash flow variables compared between MINA and OLAS
Protocol Revenue2
4OLAS +2
Revenue Trend2
5OLAS +3
P/S Multiple4
6OLAS +2
Real Staking Yield6
5MINA +1

Supply

Supply variables compared between MINA and OLAS
Supply Inflation2
5OLAS +3
Vesting Schedule3
5OLAS +2
Circulating / FDV Ratio5
5level
Buyback and Burn1
4OLAS +3

Ownership

Ownership variables compared between MINA and OLAS
Smart Money Flows4
6OLAS +2
Insider Selling3
5OLAS +2
Holder Concentration4
5OLAS +1

Traction

Traction variables compared between MINA and OLAS
TVL Trend3
4OLAS +1
Active Users3
5OLAS +2
Developer Activity6
7OLAS +1
Network Growth4
5OLAS +1

Position

Position variables compared between MINA and OLAS
Market Share3
4OLAS +1
Competitive Moat6
6level
Institutional Adoption3
5OLAS +2
Exchange Depth5
5level
Social Mindshare4
5OLAS +1

Risk

Risk variables compared between MINA and OLAS
Regulatory Safety7
6MINA +1
Catalyst Calendar4
5OLAS +1
BTC Alpha Potential3
5OLAS +2
Team Execution5
6OLAS +1
Treasury Runway6
6level

Bars read outward from the centre: MINA to the left, OLAS to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.

03

Market and supply

Market and supply figures for MINA and OLAS
MINAOLAS
Price$0.0938$0.0446
Market cap$121.4M$13.4M
Circulating100%63.2%
Dilution to full supply1x1.58x
Off all-time high-99%-99.47%
To recover the high100x188.7x
Total value locked$12.0M$28.0M
NetworkMinaEthereum

Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.

04

Catalyst and risk on each side

MINA · PASS

Catalyst

Mina zkApps enabling privacy-preserving dApps; ZK proof technology is hot sector tailwind

Principal risk

~10% annual inflation from staking; 99% below ATH; TVL near zero; ZK developer tooling complex limiting adoption

OLAS · CAUTIOUS HOLD

Catalyst

Olas Predict and Mechs gaining traction; first-mover in programmable AI agent services vs simple chatbot agents

Principal risk

91.6% down from ATH; Virtuals captured mainstream AI agent narrative; OLAS staking/locking mechanics complex for retail

05

Common questions

Is MINA or OLAS the better investment?
On this framework OLAS scores higher: 129 against 98 of 250, and it is rated CAUTIOUS HOLD against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and MINA still wins 2 of the 25 individual variables against OLAS.
What is the biggest difference between MINA and OLAS?
Revenue Trend. MINA scores 2 of 10 there and OLAS scores 5, a gap of 3 points on a single variable.
Which is bigger, MINA or OLAS?
MINA is valued at $121.4M and OLAS at $13.4M on the latest market snapshot.
06

Related comparisons

Keep reading

Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.