Similar fundamental profile

NMR vs PAXG

Numeraire and PAX Gold scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.

Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.

NMR score
98/250
150th of 251 · PASS
PAXG score
141/250
30th of 251 · HOLD
Variables won
2 to 21
2 level of 25
Framework prefers
PAXG
by 43 points
01

What separates them

NMR scores 98 of 250 and ranks 150th of 251. PAXG scores 141 and ranks 30th. PAXG leads by 43 points, which is a wide enough margin that the framework is not ambivalent. NMR takes 2 of the 25 variables, PAXG takes 21, and 2 are level.

The framework rates NMR PASS and PAXG HOLD. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.

5 variables separate them by 3 points or more. PAXG is clear on Market Share (7 against 3), Institutional Adoption (7 against 3) and Supply Inflation (8 against 5).

Both score 3 or below on Buyback and Burn, Real Staking Yield, Catalyst Calendar. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.

NMR still has 34.8% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 0.3% for PAXG. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of NMR is taking the 1.53x dilution path and a buyer of PAXG the 1x one.

PAXG is valued at $1.79B against $105.4M for NMR, a 17.0x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.

NMR trades 84.2% below its all-time high and PAXG 26.7% below its own. Recovering the high needs 6.3x from NMR and 1.4x from PAXG, which is the same statement read as the return each one has to produce.

02

All 25 variables, head to head

Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.

Cash flow

Cash flow variables compared between NMR and PAXG
Protocol Revenue3
4PAXG +1
Revenue Trend3
4PAXG +1
P/S Multiple4
5PAXG +1
Real Staking Yield3
2NMR +1

Supply

Supply variables compared between NMR and PAXG
Supply Inflation5
8PAXG +3
Vesting Schedule7
10PAXG +3
Circulating / FDV Ratio7
10PAXG +3
Buyback and Burn2
2level

Ownership

Ownership variables compared between NMR and PAXG
Smart Money Flows4
6PAXG +2
Insider Selling5
8PAXG +3
Holder Concentration3
5PAXG +2

Traction

Traction variables compared between NMR and PAXG
TVL Trend3
5PAXG +2
Active Users3
4PAXG +1
Developer Activity4
3NMR +1
Network Growth3
4PAXG +1

Position

Position variables compared between NMR and PAXG
Market Share3
7PAXG +4
Competitive Moat5
7PAXG +2
Institutional Adoption3
7PAXG +4
Exchange Depth4
6PAXG +2
Social Mindshare3
4PAXG +1

Risk

Risk variables compared between NMR and PAXG
Regulatory Safety5
8PAXG +3
Catalyst Calendar3
3level
BTC Alpha Potential3
5PAXG +2
Team Execution5
6PAXG +1
Treasury Runway5
8PAXG +3

Bars read outward from the centre: NMR to the left, PAXG to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.

03

Market and supply

Market and supply figures for NMR and PAXG
NMRPAXG
Price$14.70$4,118
Market cap$105.4M$1.79B
Circulating65.2%99.7%
Dilution to full supply1.53x1x
Off all-time high-84.2%-26.7%
To recover the high6.3x1.4x
Total value lockednot publishednot published
NetworkEthereumEthereum

Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.

04

Catalyst and risk on each side

NMR · PASS

Catalyst

AI-driven hedge fund tournaments and Numerai's staking mechanism attracting data scientists.

Principal risk

Low retail adoption; tokenomics reliant on tournament participation, not broad utility.

PAXG · HOLD

Catalyst

Gold near $4,380/oz in August 2026 after a record high in January 2026, with continued central-bank buying.

Principal risk

Paxos trust company insolvency or loss of its NYDFS trust charter would break gold redemption peg.

05

Common questions

Is NMR or PAXG the better investment?
On this framework PAXG scores higher: 141 against 98 of 250, and it is rated HOLD against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and NMR still wins 2 of the 25 individual variables against PAXG.
What is the biggest difference between NMR and PAXG?
Market Share. NMR scores 3 of 10 there and PAXG scores 7, a gap of 4 points on a single variable.
Which is bigger, NMR or PAXG?
NMR is valued at $105.4M and PAXG at $1.79B on the latest market snapshot.
06

Related comparisons

Keep reading

Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.