REQ vs STORJ
Request and Storj scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
REQ scores 97 of 250 and ranks 155th of 251. STORJ scores 108 and ranks 100th. STORJ leads by 11 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. REQ takes 1 of the 25 variables, STORJ takes 12, and 12 are level.
The framework rates REQ PASS and STORJ WATCH. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.
No single variable separates REQ and STORJ by as much as 3 points. They are close on the framework's terms, which makes price, liquidity and the supply position below the only grounds for choosing.
Both score 3 or below on Buyback and Burn, Smart Money Flows, Real Staking Yield, TVL Trend, Catalyst Calendar, Social Mindshare. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
REQ still has 20.3% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 0% for STORJ. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of REQ is taking the 1.26x dilution path and a buyer of STORJ the 1x one.
REQ is valued at $42.8M against $12.3M for STORJ, a 3.5x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 3 | 4 | STORJ +1 | |
| Revenue Trend | 3 | 4 | STORJ +1 | |
| P/S Multiple | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Real Staking Yield | 3 | 3 | level |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Vesting Schedule | 6 | 6 | level | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 6 | 7 | STORJ +1 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 3 | 2 | REQ +1 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Insider Selling | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Holder Concentration | 4 | 4 | level |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Active Users | 3 | 4 | STORJ +1 | |
| Developer Activity | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Network Growth | 3 | 4 | STORJ +1 |
Position
| Market Share | 3 | 4 | STORJ +1 | |
| Competitive Moat | 4 | 5 | STORJ +1 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 3 | 4 | STORJ +1 | |
| Exchange Depth | 4 | 5 | STORJ +1 | |
| Social Mindshare | 3 | 3 | level |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 5 | 6 | STORJ +1 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 3 | 3 | level | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 3 | 4 | STORJ +1 | |
| Team Execution | 4 | 5 | STORJ +1 | |
| Treasury Runway | 5 | 5 | level |
Bars read outward from the centre: REQ to the left, STORJ to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| REQ | STORJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0537 | $0.0289 |
| Market cap | $42.8M | $12.3M |
| Circulating | 79.7% | 100% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.26x | 1x |
| Off all-time high | -94.9% | -99.24% |
| To recover the high | 19.6x | 131.6x |
| Total value locked | not published | not published |
| Network | Ethereum | Ethereum |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
REQ · PASS
Decentralized invoicing and payment requests for DAOs and enterprises; multi-chain expansion.
Slow B2B adoption; competition from traditional fintech and newer blockchain payment rails.
STORJ · WATCH
Decentralized storage demand from AI/enterprise; Storj node network expansion.
Competition from Filecoin, Arweave; limited token utility beyond storage payments.
Common questions
- Is REQ or STORJ the better investment?
- On this framework STORJ scores higher: 108 against 97 of 250, and it is rated WATCH against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and REQ still wins 1 of the 25 individual variables against STORJ.
- What is the biggest difference between REQ and STORJ?
- Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
- Which is bigger, REQ or STORJ?
- REQ is valued at $42.8M and STORJ at $12.3M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.