Market-cap peers

UNI vs WSTETH

Uniswap and Wrapped Lido Staked ETH scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.

Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.

UNI score
167/250
9th of 251 · HOLD
WSTETH score
185/250
3rd of 251 · HOLD CORE
Variables won
7 to 13
5 level of 25
Framework prefers
WSTETH
by 18 points
01

What separates them

UNI scores 167 of 250 and ranks 9th of 251. WSTETH scores 185 and ranks 3rd. WSTETH leads by 18 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. UNI takes 7 of the 25 variables, WSTETH takes 13, and 5 are level.

The framework rates UNI HOLD and WSTETH HOLD CORE. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.

5 variables separate them by 3 points or more. UNI is clear on Regulatory Safety (9 against 6). WSTETH is clear on Real Staking Yield (9 against 3), Protocol Revenue (9 against 4) and P/S Multiple (7 against 3).

UNI still has 37.5% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 0% for WSTETH. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of UNI is taking the 1.6x dilution path and a buyer of WSTETH the 1x one.

WSTETH is valued at $11.76B against $4.91B for UNI, a 2.4x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.

UNI trades 82.5% below its all-time high and WSTETH 56% below its own. Recovering the high needs 5.7x from UNI and 2.3x from WSTETH, which is the same statement read as the return each one has to produce.

02

All 25 variables, head to head

Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.

Cash flow

Cash flow variables compared between UNI and WSTETH
Protocol Revenue4
9WSTETH +5
Revenue Trend7
8WSTETH +1
P/S Multiple3
7WSTETH +4
Real Staking Yield3
9WSTETH +6

Supply

Supply variables compared between UNI and WSTETH
Supply Inflation7
8WSTETH +1
Vesting Schedule9
10WSTETH +1
Circulating / FDV Ratio8
10WSTETH +2
Buyback and Burn7
5UNI +2

Ownership

Ownership variables compared between UNI and WSTETH
Smart Money Flows7
9WSTETH +2
Insider Selling4
8WSTETH +4
Holder Concentration5
5level

Traction

Traction variables compared between UNI and WSTETH
TVL Trend6
7WSTETH +1
Active Users8
8level
Developer Activity8
7UNI +1
Network Growth8
7UNI +1

Position

Position variables compared between UNI and WSTETH
Market Share8
8level
Competitive Moat7
8WSTETH +1
Institutional Adoption8
7UNI +1
Exchange Depth8
6UNI +2
Social Mindshare7
7level

Risk

Risk variables compared between UNI and WSTETH
Regulatory Safety9
6UNI +3
Catalyst Calendar8
6UNI +2
BTC Alpha Potential4
5WSTETH +1
Team Execution7
7level
Treasury Runway7
8WSTETH +1

Bars read outward from the centre: UNI to the left, WSTETH to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.

03

Market and supply

Market and supply figures for UNI and WSTETH
UNIWSTETH
Price$7.84$3,193
Market cap$4.91B$11.76B
Circulating62.5%100%
Dilution to full supply1.6x1x
Off all-time high-82.5%-56%
To recover the high5.7x2.3x
Total value locked$2.77B$26.00B
NetworkEthereumEthereum

Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.

04

Catalyst and risk on each side

UNI · HOLD

Catalyst

Bitwise spot UNI ETF (pending SEC), fee switch expansion to 11+ chains, BlackRock BUIDL integration + UNI purchases, Unichain UVN validators, V4 hooks marketplace, SEC safe harbor (5yr), CLARITY Act advancing

Principal risk

P/S 57-73x on actual protocol revenue ($26-61M not $1B), net inflationary +1.43%/yr (20M growth budget > 4.4M burns), $200M+ insider/VC selling in 2025, top 10 holders control 50.81%, Fluid took 55% stablecoin DEX share, aggregators route 50%+ of ETH volume

WSTETH · HOLD CORE

Catalyst

WstETH becoming default collateral across all major lending protocols; MakerDAO, Aave, Spark all natively integrated

Principal risk

Lido centralization risk (about 24% of staked ETH, down from a 32% peak in 2023); Ethereum validator concentration concerns; potential regulatory classification as security

05

Common questions

Is UNI or WSTETH the better investment?
On this framework WSTETH scores higher: 185 against 167 of 250, and it is rated HOLD CORE against HOLD. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and UNI still wins 7 of the 25 individual variables against WSTETH.
What is the biggest difference between UNI and WSTETH?
Real Staking Yield. UNI scores 3 of 10 there and WSTETH scores 9, a gap of 6 points on a single variable.
Which is bigger, UNI or WSTETH?
UNI is valued at $4.91B and WSTETH at $11.76B on the latest market snapshot.
06

Related comparisons

Keep reading

Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.