XTZ vs ZIL
Tezos and Zilliqa scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
XTZ scores 88 of 250 and ranks 199th of 251. ZIL scores 63 and ranks 242nd. XTZ leads by 25 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. XTZ takes 19 of the 25 variables, ZIL takes 0, and 6 are level.
One variable separates them by 3 points or more. XTZ is clear on Institutional Adoption (4 against 1).
Both score 3 or below on Protocol Revenue, Revenue Trend, P/S Multiple, Buyback and Burn, Smart Money Flows, TVL Trend and 8 more. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
XTZ is valued at $336.3M against $64.9M for ZIL, a 5.2x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 2 | 1 | XTZ +1 | |
| Revenue Trend | 2 | 1 | XTZ +1 | |
| P/S Multiple | 3 | 2 | XTZ +1 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 5 | 4 | XTZ +1 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Vesting Schedule | 7 | 6 | XTZ +1 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 8 | 6 | XTZ +2 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 1 | 1 | level |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 2 | 1 | XTZ +1 | |
| Insider Selling | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Holder Concentration | 4 | 3 | XTZ +1 |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 2 | 1 | XTZ +1 | |
| Active Users | 2 | 1 | XTZ +1 | |
| Developer Activity | 3 | 2 | XTZ +1 | |
| Network Growth | 2 | 1 | XTZ +1 |
Position
| Market Share | 2 | 1 | XTZ +1 | |
| Competitive Moat | 3 | 1 | XTZ +2 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 4 | 1 | XTZ +3 | |
| Exchange Depth | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Social Mindshare | 2 | 1 | XTZ +1 |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 7 | 7 | level | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 2 | 2 | level | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 2 | 1 | XTZ +1 | |
| Team Execution | 4 | 2 | XTZ +2 | |
| Treasury Runway | 5 | 3 | XTZ +2 |
Bars read outward from the centre: XTZ to the left, ZIL to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| XTZ | ZIL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3062 | $0.003325 |
| Market cap | $336.3M | $64.9M |
| Circulating | 98.2% | 92.9% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.02x | 1.08x |
| Off all-time high | -96.6% | -98.7% |
| To recover the high | 29.4x | 76.9x |
| Total value locked | $22.0M | $1.2M |
| Network | Tezos | Zilliqa |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
XTZ · PASS
Tezos institutional tokenization and RWA focus may sustain niche enterprise use
No meaningful DeFi network, developer exodus, volume near all-time-lows, token has no value accrual mechanism
ZIL · PASS
Zilliqa 2.0 EVM upgrade could attract some EVM developers
Irrelevant tech, ghost network, near-zero TVL, no institutional interest
Common questions
- Is XTZ or ZIL the better investment?
- On this framework XTZ scores higher: 88 against 63 of 250, and it is rated PASS against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and XTZ still wins 19 of the 25 individual variables against ZIL.
- What is the biggest difference between XTZ and ZIL?
- Institutional Adoption. XTZ scores 4 of 10 there and ZIL scores 1, a gap of 3 points on a single variable.
- Which is bigger, XTZ or ZIL?
- XTZ is valued at $336.3M and ZIL at $64.9M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.