ATH vs GNS
Aethir and Gains Network scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
ATH scores 101 of 250 and ranks 135th of 251. GNS scores 116 and ranks 81st. GNS leads by 15 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. ATH takes 8 of the 25 variables, GNS takes 11, and 6 are level.
5 variables separate them by 3 points or more. GNS is clear on Buyback and Burn (8 against 2), P/S Multiple (8 against 4) and Vesting Schedule (8 against 4).
Both score 3 or below on Market Share, Institutional Adoption. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
ATH still has 52.1% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 0% for GNS. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of ATH is taking the 2.09x dilution path and a buyer of GNS the 1x one.
ATH is valued at $132.9M against $9.5M for GNS, a 14.0x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Revenue Trend | 5 | 3 | ATH +2 | |
| P/S Multiple | 4 | 8 | GNS +4 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 3 | 4 | GNS +1 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 4 | 7 | GNS +3 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 4 | 8 | GNS +4 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 4 | 3 | ATH +1 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 2 | 8 | GNS +6 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 4 | 5 | GNS +1 | |
| Insider Selling | 4 | 7 | GNS +3 | |
| Holder Concentration | 4 | 4 | level |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Active Users | 4 | 3 | ATH +1 | |
| Developer Activity | 5 | 6 | GNS +1 | |
| Network Growth | 5 | 5 | level |
Position
| Market Share | 3 | 2 | ATH +1 | |
| Competitive Moat | 4 | 5 | GNS +1 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Exchange Depth | 4 | 3 | ATH +1 | |
| Social Mindshare | 4 | 3 | ATH +1 |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 5 | 3 | ATH +2 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 5 | 5 | level | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 4 | 2 | ATH +2 | |
| Team Execution | 5 | 6 | GNS +1 | |
| Treasury Runway | 4 | 5 | GNS +1 |
Bars read outward from the centre: ATH to the left, GNS to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| ATH | GNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.006602 | $0.3987 |
| Market cap | $132.9M | $9.5M |
| Circulating | 47.9% | 100% |
| Dilution to full supply | 2.09x | 1x |
| Off all-time high | -94.4% | -96.8% |
| To recover the high | 17.9x | 31.2x |
| Total value locked | not published | $50.0M |
| Network | Arbitrum | Arbitrum |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
ATH · WATCH
Aethir decentralized GPU compute demand from AI and gaming sectors, with enterprise partnerships.
Competition from centralized cloud providers and technical challenges in node network reliability.
GNS · WATCH
GTrade v10, RWA/forex expansion (270+ markets), DEGEN markets, staking v2
Hyperliquid 73% share vs GNS declining, Bitget delisted, $113K daily volume = liquidity risk
Common questions
- Is ATH or GNS the better investment?
- On this framework GNS scores higher: 116 against 101 of 250, and it is rated WATCH against WATCH. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and ATH still wins 8 of the 25 individual variables against GNS.
- What is the biggest difference between ATH and GNS?
- Buyback and Burn. ATH scores 2 of 10 there and GNS scores 8, a gap of 6 points on a single variable.
- Which is bigger, ATH or GNS?
- ATH is valued at $132.9M and GNS at $9.5M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.