ATH vs MAV
Aethir and Maverick Protocol scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
ATH scores 101 of 250 and ranks 135th of 251. MAV scores 121 and ranks 63rd. MAV leads by 20 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. ATH takes 0 of the 25 variables, MAV takes 18, and 7 are level.
The framework rates ATH WATCH and MAV CAUTIOUS HOLD. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.
No single variable separates ATH and MAV by as much as 3 points. The lead is broad rather than concentrated: MAV is ahead on 18 of 25 variables by one or two points each, which is what produces the composite gap without any one variable carrying it.
Both score 3 or below on Buyback and Burn, Institutional Adoption. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
ATH is valued at $132.9M against $13.1M for MAV, a 10.2x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 4 | 5 | MAV +1 | |
| Revenue Trend | 5 | 6 | MAV +1 | |
| P/S Multiple | 4 | 6 | MAV +2 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 3 | 4 | MAV +1 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 4 | 5 | MAV +1 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 4 | 5 | MAV +1 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 4 | 5 | MAV +1 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 2 | 3 | MAV +1 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 4 | 5 | MAV +1 | |
| Insider Selling | 4 | 5 | MAV +1 | |
| Holder Concentration | 4 | 4 | level |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 4 | 6 | MAV +2 | |
| Active Users | 4 | 5 | MAV +1 | |
| Developer Activity | 5 | 6 | MAV +1 | |
| Network Growth | 5 | 5 | level |
Position
| Market Share | 3 | 4 | MAV +1 | |
| Competitive Moat | 4 | 5 | MAV +1 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Exchange Depth | 4 | 5 | MAV +1 | |
| Social Mindshare | 4 | 4 | level |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 5 | 5 | level | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Team Execution | 5 | 6 | MAV +1 | |
| Treasury Runway | 4 | 5 | MAV +1 |
Bars read outward from the centre: ATH to the left, MAV to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| ATH | MAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.006602 | $0.0111 |
| Market cap | $132.9M | $13.1M |
| Circulating | 47.9% | 58.6% |
| Dilution to full supply | 2.09x | 1.71x |
| Off all-time high | -94.4% | -98.6% |
| To recover the high | 17.9x | 71.4x |
| Total value locked | not published | not published |
| Network | Arbitrum | Ethereum |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
ATH · WATCH
Aethir decentralized GPU compute demand from AI and gaming sectors, with enterprise partnerships.
Competition from centralized cloud providers and technical challenges in node network reliability.
MAV · CAUTIOUS HOLD
Maverick's dynamic fee AMM integration with zkSync Era, boosting daily volume to $50M by May 2025.
Uniswap v4 hooks on L2s (Arbitrum/Optimism) capture 90% of Maverick's targeted liquidity provision.
Common questions
- Is ATH or MAV the better investment?
- On this framework MAV scores higher: 121 against 101 of 250, and it is rated CAUTIOUS HOLD against WATCH. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and ATH still wins 0 of the 25 individual variables against MAV.
- What is the biggest difference between ATH and MAV?
- Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
- Which is bigger, ATH or MAV?
- ATH is valued at $132.9M and MAV at $13.1M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.