BLAST vs RDNT
Blast and Radiant Capital scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
BLAST scores 87 of 250 and ranks 206th of 251. RDNT scores 104 and ranks 118th. RDNT leads by 17 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. BLAST takes 3 of the 25 variables, RDNT takes 17, and 5 are level.
The framework rates BLAST PASS and RDNT WATCH. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.
No single variable separates BLAST and RDNT by as much as 3 points. The lead is broad rather than concentrated: RDNT is ahead on 17 of 25 variables by one or two points each, which is what produces the composite gap without any one variable carrying it.
Both score 3 or below on Buyback and Burn, Market Share, Institutional Adoption. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
BLAST still has 29.2% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 4.2% for RDNT. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of BLAST is taking the 1.41x dilution path and a buyer of RDNT the 1.04x one.
BLAST is valued at $4.9M against $1.0M for RDNT, a 4.8x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 2 | 4 | RDNT +2 | |
| Revenue Trend | 2 | 4 | RDNT +2 | |
| P/S Multiple | 7 | 5 | BLAST +2 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 5 | 5 | level |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 2 | 4 | RDNT +2 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 2 | 4 | RDNT +2 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Buyback and Burn | 1 | 3 | RDNT +2 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 | |
| Insider Selling | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 | |
| Holder Concentration | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 | |
| Active Users | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 | |
| Developer Activity | 4 | 5 | RDNT +1 | |
| Network Growth | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 |
Position
| Market Share | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Competitive Moat | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 2 | 3 | RDNT +1 | |
| Exchange Depth | 7 | 5 | BLAST +2 | |
| Social Mindshare | 4 | 4 | level |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 | |
| Team Execution | 4 | 5 | RDNT +1 | |
| Treasury Runway | 5 | 4 | BLAST +1 |
Bars read outward from the centre: BLAST to the left, RDNT to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| BLAST | RDNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000069 | $0.000715 |
| Market cap | $4.9M | $1.0M |
| Circulating | 70.8% | 95.8% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.41x | 1.04x |
| Off all-time high | -99.76% | -99.88% |
| To recover the high | 416.7x | 833.3x |
| Total value locked | $280.0M | not published |
| Network | Blast | Arbitrum |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
BLAST · PASS
Blast Big Bang network revival if native yield products attract real users beyond yield chasers
98.4% down from ATH; only 25% circulating with years of vesting pressure; yield farming narrative is played out
RDNT · WATCH
Omnichain lending expansion across Arbitrum, BSC, and Ethereum; LayerZero integration drives cross-chain TVL.
Smart contract risk from cross-chain bridging; high token emissions and potential for bad debt in volatile markets.
Common questions
- Is BLAST or RDNT the better investment?
- On this framework RDNT scores higher: 104 against 87 of 250, and it is rated WATCH against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and BLAST still wins 3 of the 25 individual variables against RDNT.
- What is the biggest difference between BLAST and RDNT?
- Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
- Which is bigger, BLAST or RDNT?
- BLAST is valued at $4.9M and RDNT at $1.0M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.