BLUR vs SCROLL
Blur and Scroll scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
BLUR scores 84 of 250 and ranks 213th of 251. SCROLL scores 102 and ranks 129th. SCROLL leads by 18 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. BLUR takes 2 of the 25 variables, SCROLL takes 16, and 7 are level.
The framework rates BLUR PASS and SCROLL WATCH. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.
No single variable separates BLUR and SCROLL by as much as 3 points. The lead is broad rather than concentrated: SCROLL is ahead on 16 of 25 variables by one or two points each, which is what produces the composite gap without any one variable carrying it.
Both score 3 or below on Protocol Revenue, Revenue Trend, Supply Inflation, Vesting Schedule, Circulating / FDV Ratio, Buyback and Burn and 3 more. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
SCROLL still has 81% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 3.2% for BLUR. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of SCROLL is taking the 5.26x dilution path and a buyer of BLUR the 1.03x one.
BLUR is valued at $55.8M against $4.7M for SCROLL, a 11.8x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Revenue Trend | 2 | 3 | SCROLL +1 | |
| P/S Multiple | 5 | 6 | SCROLL +1 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 2 | 3 | SCROLL +1 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 2 | 2 | level | |
| Vesting Schedule | 2 | 2 | level | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 3 | 2 | BLUR +1 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 2 | 2 | level |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 3 | 4 | SCROLL +1 | |
| Insider Selling | 2 | 3 | SCROLL +1 | |
| Holder Concentration | 3 | 3 | level |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 2 | 4 | SCROLL +2 | |
| Active Users | 3 | 4 | SCROLL +1 | |
| Developer Activity | 4 | 6 | SCROLL +2 | |
| Network Growth | 3 | 4 | SCROLL +1 |
Position
| Market Share | 5 | 4 | BLUR +1 | |
| Competitive Moat | 4 | 5 | SCROLL +1 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 3 | 4 | SCROLL +1 | |
| Exchange Depth | 5 | 7 | SCROLL +2 | |
| Social Mindshare | 4 | 4 | level |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 5 | 7 | SCROLL +2 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 4 | 4 | level | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 3 | 4 | SCROLL +1 | |
| Team Execution | 5 | 6 | SCROLL +1 | |
| Treasury Runway | 5 | 6 | SCROLL +1 |
Bars read outward from the centre: BLUR to the left, SCROLL to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| BLUR | SCROLL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0192 | $0.0248 |
| Market cap | $55.8M | $4.7M |
| Circulating | 96.8% | 19% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.03x | 5.26x |
| Off all-time high | -99.62% | -98.3% |
| To recover the high | 263.2x | 58.8x |
| Total value locked | not published | $115.0M |
| Network | Ethereum | Scroll |
SCROLL now trades as SCR. The scoring pass ran under the old ticker, so the scores above are filed there while the market figures track the new one.
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
BLUR · PASS
NFT market revival in a bull cycle could briefly spike BLUR trading volumes
Only 38% circulating with massive team/investor vesting schedule; NFT volumes down 90%+ from 2022 peak
SCROLL · WATCH
ZK proof generation cost reductions enabling Scroll to undercut Arbitrum/Optimism on fees at scale
Only 19% circulating; EVM-equivalence not enough to differentiate; TVL stagnant vs Base which dominates mindshare
Common questions
- Is BLUR or SCROLL the better investment?
- On this framework SCROLL scores higher: 102 against 84 of 250, and it is rated WATCH against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and BLUR still wins 2 of the 25 individual variables against SCROLL.
- What is the biggest difference between BLUR and SCROLL?
- Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
- Which is bigger, BLUR or SCROLL?
- BLUR is valued at $55.8M and SCROLL at $4.7M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.