Similar fundamental profile

BLUR vs ZK

Blur and ZKsync scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.

Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.

BLUR score
84/250
213th of 251 · PASS
ZK score
95/250
167th of 251 · PASS
Variables won
3 to 13
9 level of 25
Framework prefers
ZK
by 11 points
01

What separates them

BLUR scores 84 of 250 and ranks 213th of 251. ZK scores 95 and ranks 167th. ZK leads by 11 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. BLUR takes 3 of the 25 variables, ZK takes 13, and 9 are level.

No single variable separates BLUR and ZK by as much as 3 points. They are close on the framework's terms, which makes price, liquidity and the supply position below the only grounds for choosing.

Both score 3 or below on Protocol Revenue, Revenue Trend, Supply Inflation, Vesting Schedule, Circulating / FDV Ratio, Buyback and Burn and 6 more. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.

ZK still has 48.5% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 3.2% for BLUR. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of ZK is taking the 1.94x dilution path and a buyer of BLUR the 1.03x one.

ZK is valued at $129.1M against $55.8M for BLUR, a 2.3x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.

02

All 25 variables, head to head

Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.

Cash flow

Cash flow variables compared between BLUR and ZK
Protocol Revenue3
3level
Revenue Trend2
3ZK +1
P/S Multiple5
6ZK +1
Real Staking Yield2
3ZK +1

Supply

Supply variables compared between BLUR and ZK
Supply Inflation2
2level
Vesting Schedule2
1BLUR +1
Circulating / FDV Ratio3
2BLUR +1
Buyback and Burn2
2level

Ownership

Ownership variables compared between BLUR and ZK
Smart Money Flows3
4ZK +1
Insider Selling2
3ZK +1
Holder Concentration3
3level

Traction

Traction variables compared between BLUR and ZK
TVL Trend2
3ZK +1
Active Users3
3level
Developer Activity4
5ZK +1
Network Growth3
4ZK +1

Position

Position variables compared between BLUR and ZK
Market Share5
3BLUR +2
Competitive Moat4
5ZK +1
Institutional Adoption3
4ZK +1
Exchange Depth5
7ZK +2
Social Mindshare4
4level

Risk

Risk variables compared between BLUR and ZK
Regulatory Safety5
7ZK +2
Catalyst Calendar4
4level
BTC Alpha Potential3
3level
Team Execution5
5level
Treasury Runway5
6ZK +1

Bars read outward from the centre: BLUR to the left, ZK to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.

03

Market and supply

Market and supply figures for BLUR and ZK
BLURZK
Price$0.0192$0.0119
Market cap$55.8M$129.1M
Circulating96.8%51.5%
Dilution to full supply1.03x1.94x
Off all-time high-99.62%-96.3%
To recover the high263.2x27x
Total value lockednot published$95.0M
NetworkEthereumzkSync

Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.

04

Catalyst and risk on each side

BLUR · PASS

Catalyst

NFT market revival in a bull cycle could briefly spike BLUR trading volumes

Principal risk

Only 38% circulating with massive team/investor vesting schedule; NFT volumes down 90%+ from 2022 peak

ZK · PASS

Catalyst

ZK Stack elastic chain network expansion and ZKsync native account abstraction adoption

Principal risk

Only 17% circulating supply with years of heavy releases ahead; TVL and developer activity abandoned after airdrop controversy

05

Common questions

Is BLUR or ZK the better investment?
On this framework ZK scores higher: 95 against 84 of 250, and it is rated PASS against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and BLUR still wins 3 of the 25 individual variables against ZK.
What is the biggest difference between BLUR and ZK?
Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
Which is bigger, BLUR or ZK?
BLUR is valued at $55.8M and ZK at $129.1M on the latest market snapshot.
06

Related comparisons

Keep reading

Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.