IO vs ZK
io.net and ZKsync scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
IO scores 108 of 250 and ranks 100th of 251. ZK scores 95 and ranks 167th. IO leads by 13 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. IO takes 15 of the 25 variables, ZK takes 2, and 8 are level.
The framework rates IO WATCH and ZK PASS. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.
No single variable separates IO and ZK by as much as 3 points. The lead is broad rather than concentrated: IO is ahead on 15 of 25 variables by one or two points each, which is what produces the composite gap without any one variable carrying it.
Both score 3 or below on Supply Inflation, Vesting Schedule, Circulating / FDV Ratio, Buyback and Burn, Insider Selling, Holder Concentration. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
ZK is valued at $129.1M against $63.1M for IO, a 2.0x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 4 | 3 | IO +1 | |
| Revenue Trend | 5 | 3 | IO +2 | |
| P/S Multiple | 6 | 6 | level | |
| Real Staking Yield | 4 | 3 | IO +1 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 2 | 2 | level | |
| Vesting Schedule | 2 | 1 | IO +1 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 2 | 2 | level | |
| Buyback and Burn | 3 | 2 | IO +1 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 5 | 4 | IO +1 | |
| Insider Selling | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Holder Concentration | 3 | 3 | level |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 4 | 3 | IO +1 | |
| Active Users | 4 | 3 | IO +1 | |
| Developer Activity | 6 | 5 | IO +1 | |
| Network Growth | 5 | 4 | IO +1 |
Position
| Market Share | 4 | 3 | IO +1 | |
| Competitive Moat | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Institutional Adoption | 5 | 4 | IO +1 | |
| Exchange Depth | 5 | 7 | ZK +2 | |
| Social Mindshare | 4 | 4 | level |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 6 | 7 | ZK +1 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 5 | 4 | IO +1 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 4 | 3 | IO +1 | |
| Team Execution | 6 | 5 | IO +1 | |
| Treasury Runway | 6 | 6 | level |
Bars read outward from the centre: IO to the left, ZK to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| IO | ZK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1537 | $0.0119 |
| Market cap | $63.1M | $129.1M |
| Circulating | 51.3% | 51.5% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.95x | 1.94x |
| Off all-time high | -97.6% | -96.3% |
| To recover the high | 41.7x | 27x |
| Total value locked | not published | $95.0M |
| Network | Ethereum | zkSync |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
IO · WATCH
AI compute demand boom driving GPU marketplace utilization; IO Cloud enterprise partnerships expanding real revenue
Only 18% circulating; 82% supply open over 3 years creates structural sell pressure; competing with Akash, Render, and centralized clouds
ZK · PASS
ZK Stack elastic chain network expansion and ZKsync native account abstraction adoption
Only 17% circulating supply with years of heavy releases ahead; TVL and developer activity abandoned after airdrop controversy
Common questions
- Is IO or ZK the better investment?
- On this framework IO scores higher: 108 against 95 of 250, and it is rated WATCH against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and IO still wins 15 of the 25 individual variables against ZK.
- What is the biggest difference between IO and ZK?
- Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
- Which is bigger, IO or ZK?
- IO is valued at $63.1M and ZK at $129.1M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.