Similar fundamental profile

IO vs STRK

io.net and Starknet scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.

Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.

IO score
108/250
100th of 251 · WATCH
STRK score
93/250
177th of 251 · PASS
Variables won
16 to 3
6 level of 25
Framework prefers
IO
by 15 points
01

What separates them

IO scores 108 of 250 and ranks 100th of 251. STRK scores 93 and ranks 177th. IO leads by 15 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. IO takes 16 of the 25 variables, STRK takes 3, and 6 are level.

The framework rates IO WATCH and STRK PASS. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.

No single variable separates IO and STRK by as much as 3 points. The lead is broad rather than concentrated: IO is ahead on 16 of 25 variables by one or two points each, which is what produces the composite gap without any one variable carrying it.

Both score 3 or below on Supply Inflation, Vesting Schedule, Circulating / FDV Ratio, Buyback and Burn, Insider Selling, Holder Concentration. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.

IO still has 48.7% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 25.8% for STRK. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of IO is taking the 1.95x dilution path and a buyer of STRK the 1.35x one.

STRK is valued at $366.4M against $63.1M for IO, a 5.8x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.

02

All 25 variables, head to head

Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.

Cash flow

Cash flow variables compared between IO and STRK
Protocol Revenue4
2IO +2
Revenue Trend5
3IO +2
P/S Multiple6
6level
Real Staking Yield4
3IO +1

Supply

Supply variables compared between IO and STRK
Supply Inflation2
2level
Vesting Schedule2
1IO +1
Circulating / FDV Ratio2
2level
Buyback and Burn3
1IO +2

Ownership

Ownership variables compared between IO and STRK
Smart Money Flows5
4IO +1
Insider Selling3
2IO +1
Holder Concentration3
2IO +1

Traction

Traction variables compared between IO and STRK
TVL Trend4
3IO +1
Active Users4
3IO +1
Developer Activity6
6level
Network Growth5
4IO +1

Position

Position variables compared between IO and STRK
Market Share4
3IO +1
Competitive Moat5
6STRK +1
Institutional Adoption5
4IO +1
Exchange Depth5
7STRK +2
Social Mindshare4
4level

Risk

Risk variables compared between IO and STRK
Regulatory Safety6
7STRK +1
Catalyst Calendar5
4IO +1
BTC Alpha Potential4
3IO +1
Team Execution6
5IO +1
Treasury Runway6
6level

Bars read outward from the centre: IO to the left, STRK to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.

03

Market and supply

Market and supply figures for IO and STRK
IOSTRK
Price$0.1537$0.0494
Market cap$63.1M$366.4M
Circulating51.3%74.2%
Dilution to full supply1.95x1.35x
Off all-time high-97.6%-98.9%
To recover the high41.7x90.9x
Total value lockednot published$70.0M
NetworkEthereumStarknet

Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.

04

Catalyst and risk on each side

IO · WATCH

Catalyst

AI compute demand boom driving GPU marketplace utilization; IO Cloud enterprise partnerships expanding real revenue

Principal risk

Only 18% circulating; 82% supply open over 3 years creates structural sell pressure; competing with Akash, Render, and centralized clouds

STRK · PASS

Catalyst

Starknet v0.13+ performance upgrades reducing fees; Cairo language adoption for AI and gaming use cases

Principal risk

Only 20% circulating; StarkWare holds massive allocation being released; TVL and activity near zero relative to potential

05

Common questions

Is IO or STRK the better investment?
On this framework IO scores higher: 108 against 93 of 250, and it is rated WATCH against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and IO still wins 16 of the 25 individual variables against STRK.
What is the biggest difference between IO and STRK?
Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
Which is bigger, IO or STRK?
IO is valued at $63.1M and STRK at $366.4M on the latest market snapshot.
06

Related comparisons

Keep reading

Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.