Similar fundamental profile

USUAL vs ZK

Usual Protocol and ZKsync scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.

Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.

USUAL score
99/250
147th of 251 · PASS
ZK score
95/250
167th of 251 · PASS
Variables won
7 to 5
13 level of 25
Framework prefers
USUAL
by 4 points
01

What separates them

USUAL scores 99 of 250 and ranks 147th of 251. ZK scores 95 and ranks 167th. USUAL leads by 4 points, which is inside the range where the individual variables matter more than the total. USUAL takes 7 of the 25 variables, ZK takes 5, and 13 are level.

No single variable separates USUAL and ZK by as much as 3 points. They are close on the framework's terms, which makes price, liquidity and the supply position below the only grounds for choosing.

Both score 3 or below on Revenue Trend, Supply Inflation, Vesting Schedule, Insider Selling, TVL Trend, Market Share and 1 more. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.

ZK is valued at $129.1M against $23.6M for USUAL, a 5.5x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.

02

All 25 variables, head to head

Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.

Cash flow

Cash flow variables compared between USUAL and ZK
Protocol Revenue4
3USUAL +1
Revenue Trend3
3level
P/S Multiple6
6level
Real Staking Yield5
3USUAL +2

Supply

Supply variables compared between USUAL and ZK
Supply Inflation2
2level
Vesting Schedule2
1USUAL +1
Circulating / FDV Ratio4
2USUAL +2
Buyback and Burn4
2USUAL +2

Ownership

Ownership variables compared between USUAL and ZK
Smart Money Flows4
4level
Insider Selling3
3level
Holder Concentration4
3USUAL +1

Traction

Traction variables compared between USUAL and ZK
TVL Trend3
3level
Active Users4
3USUAL +1
Developer Activity5
5level
Network Growth4
4level

Position

Position variables compared between USUAL and ZK
Market Share3
3level
Competitive Moat4
5ZK +1
Institutional Adoption4
4level
Exchange Depth6
7ZK +1
Social Mindshare4
4level

Risk

Risk variables compared between USUAL and ZK
Regulatory Safety5
7ZK +2
Catalyst Calendar4
4level
BTC Alpha Potential3
3level
Team Execution4
5ZK +1
Treasury Runway5
6ZK +1

Bars read outward from the centre: USUAL to the left, ZK to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.

03

Market and supply

Market and supply figures for USUAL and ZK
USUALZK
Price$0.0121$0.0119
Market cap$23.6M$129.1M
Circulating65%51.5%
Dilution to full supply1.54x1.94x
Off all-time high-99.25%-96.3%
To recover the high133.3x27x
Total value locked$350.0M$95.0M
NetworkEthereumzkSync

Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.

04

Catalyst and risk on each side

USUAL · PASS

Catalyst

USD0++ liquid staking recovery and new RWA yield products bringing TVL back above $500M

Principal risk

USD0++ depeg incident in Jan 2025 destroyed trust; USUAL token hyperinflation via revenue redistribution model; TVL down 80%+ from peak

ZK · PASS

Catalyst

ZK Stack elastic chain network expansion and ZKsync native account abstraction adoption

Principal risk

Only 17% circulating supply with years of heavy releases ahead; TVL and developer activity abandoned after airdrop controversy

05

Common questions

Is USUAL or ZK the better investment?
On this framework USUAL scores higher: 99 against 95 of 250, and it is rated PASS against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and USUAL still wins 7 of the 25 individual variables against ZK.
What is the biggest difference between USUAL and ZK?
Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
Which is bigger, USUAL or ZK?
USUAL is valued at $23.6M and ZK at $129.1M on the latest market snapshot.
06

Related comparisons

Keep reading

Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.