CELO vs ROSE
Celo and Oasis Network scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
CELO scores 94 of 250 and ranks 173rd of 251. ROSE scores 84 and ranks 213th. CELO leads by 10 points, which is inside the range where the individual variables matter more than the total. CELO takes 10 of the 25 variables, ROSE takes 1, and 14 are level.
No single variable separates CELO and ROSE by as much as 3 points. They are close on the framework's terms, which makes price, liquidity and the supply position below the only grounds for choosing.
Both score 3 or below on Protocol Revenue, Revenue Trend, Buyback and Burn, Smart Money Flows, TVL Trend, Active Users and 4 more. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
CELO still has 39.2% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 19.6% for ROSE. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of CELO is taking the 1.64x dilution path and a buyer of ROSE the 1.24x one.
ROSE is valued at $62.0M against $57.3M for CELO, a 1.1x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 2 | 2 | level | |
| Revenue Trend | 2 | 2 | level | |
| P/S Multiple | 4 | 3 | CELO +1 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 5 | 5 | level |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 4 | 3 | CELO +1 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 4 | 3 | CELO +1 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 6 | 5 | CELO +1 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 2 | 1 | CELO +1 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Insider Selling | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Holder Concentration | 4 | 4 | level |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 3 | 2 | CELO +1 | |
| Active Users | 3 | 2 | CELO +1 | |
| Developer Activity | 5 | 4 | CELO +1 | |
| Network Growth | 4 | 2 | CELO +2 |
Position
| Market Share | 2 | 2 | level | |
| Competitive Moat | 3 | 4 | ROSE +1 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Exchange Depth | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Social Mindshare | 3 | 3 | level |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 7 | 6 | CELO +1 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 4 | 4 | level | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Team Execution | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Treasury Runway | 5 | 5 | level |
Bars read outward from the centre: CELO to the left, ROSE to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| CELO | ROSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0942 | $0.007712 |
| Market cap | $57.3M | $62.0M |
| Circulating | 60.8% | 80.4% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.64x | 1.24x |
| Off all-time high | -99.04% | -98.7% |
| To recover the high | 104.2x | 76.9x |
| Total value locked | $42.0M | $7.5M |
| Network | Celo | Oasis |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
CELO · PASS
Full Ethereum L2 migration (Celo L2 live) enabling ETH composability and shared liquidity
99%+ down from ATH; minimal TVL ($42M); mobile DeFi thesis hasn't materialized; CELO inflation from staking rewards
ROSE · PASS
Oasis Sapphire confidential EVM ParaTime could attract privacy-sensitive DeFi as MEV concerns grow
Large unreleased supply (43% locked), near-zero TVL, privacy narrative crowded by Aztec and ZK solutions
Common questions
- Is CELO or ROSE the better investment?
- On this framework CELO scores higher: 94 against 84 of 250, and it is rated PASS against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and CELO still wins 10 of the 25 individual variables against ROSE.
- What is the biggest difference between CELO and ROSE?
- Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
- Which is bigger, CELO or ROSE?
- CELO is valued at $57.3M and ROSE at $62.0M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.