CFX vs ROSE
Conflux and Oasis Network scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
CFX scores 98 of 250 and ranks 150th of 251. ROSE scores 84 and ranks 213th. CFX leads by 14 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. CFX takes 11 of the 25 variables, ROSE takes 1, and 13 are level.
No single variable separates CFX and ROSE by as much as 3 points. They are close on the framework's terms, which makes price, liquidity and the supply position below the only grounds for choosing.
Both score 3 or below on Protocol Revenue, Revenue Trend, Supply Inflation, Vesting Schedule, Buyback and Burn, Smart Money Flows and 5 more. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
ROSE still has 19.6% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 0% for CFX. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of ROSE is taking the 1.24x dilution path and a buyer of CFX the 1x one.
CFX is valued at $265.8M against $62.0M for ROSE, a 4.3x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 2 | 2 | level | |
| Revenue Trend | 3 | 2 | CFX +1 | |
| P/S Multiple | 4 | 3 | CFX +1 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 5 | 5 | level |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Vesting Schedule | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 4 | 5 | ROSE +1 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 2 | 1 | CFX +1 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Insider Selling | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Holder Concentration | 4 | 4 | level |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 3 | 2 | CFX +1 | |
| Active Users | 3 | 2 | CFX +1 | |
| Developer Activity | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Network Growth | 4 | 2 | CFX +2 |
Position
| Market Share | 3 | 2 | CFX +1 | |
| Competitive Moat | 6 | 4 | CFX +2 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 5 | 3 | CFX +2 | |
| Exchange Depth | 6 | 5 | CFX +1 | |
| Social Mindshare | 3 | 3 | level |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 8 | 6 | CFX +2 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 4 | 4 | level | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Team Execution | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Treasury Runway | 5 | 5 | level |
Bars read outward from the centre: CFX to the left, ROSE to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| CFX | ROSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0507 | $0.007712 |
| Market cap | $265.8M | $62.0M |
| Circulating | 100% | 80.4% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1x | 1.24x |
| Off all-time high | -97% | -98.7% |
| To recover the high | 33.3x | 76.9x |
| Total value locked | $12.0M | $7.5M |
| Network | Conflux | Oasis |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
CFX · PASS
China digital economy policy tailwinds; partnerships with Shanghai government and state enterprises could drive domestic use
48% supply still opening, network entirely dependent on Chinese regulatory favor, no global DeFi adoption
ROSE · PASS
Oasis Sapphire confidential EVM ParaTime could attract privacy-sensitive DeFi as MEV concerns grow
Large unreleased supply (43% locked), near-zero TVL, privacy narrative crowded by Aztec and ZK solutions
Common questions
- Is CFX or ROSE the better investment?
- On this framework CFX scores higher: 98 against 84 of 250, and it is rated PASS against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and CFX still wins 11 of the 25 individual variables against ROSE.
- What is the biggest difference between CFX and ROSE?
- Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
- Which is bigger, CFX or ROSE?
- CFX is valued at $265.8M and ROSE at $62.0M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.