Market-cap peers

CRO vs SKY

Cronos and Sky (formerly Maker) scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.

Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.

CRO score
102/250
129th of 251 · WATCH
SKY score
141/250
30th of 251 · CAUTIOUS HOLD
Variables won
6 to 16
3 level of 25
Framework prefers
SKY
by 39 points
01

What separates them

CRO scores 102 of 250 and ranks 129th of 251. SKY scores 141 and ranks 30th. SKY leads by 39 points, which is a wide enough margin that the framework is not ambivalent. CRO takes 6 of the 25 variables, SKY takes 16, and 3 are level.

The framework rates CRO WATCH and SKY CAUTIOUS HOLD. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.

5 variables separate them by 3 points or more. SKY is clear on Protocol Revenue (8 against 3), Revenue Trend (7 against 3) and Vesting Schedule (9 against 5).

Both score 3 or below on Holder Concentration. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.

CRO still has 50.5% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 0.1% for SKY. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of CRO is taking the 2.02x dilution path and a buyer of SKY the 1x one.

CRO is valued at $3.12B against $1.86B for SKY, a 1.7x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.

CRO trades 92.9% below its all-time high and SKY 21.2% below its own. Recovering the high needs 14.1x from CRO and 1.3x from SKY, which is the same statement read as the return each one has to produce.

02

All 25 variables, head to head

Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.

Cash flow

Cash flow variables compared between CRO and SKY
Protocol Revenue3
8SKY +5
Revenue Trend3
7SKY +4
P/S Multiple4
7SKY +3
Real Staking Yield5
6SKY +1

Supply

Supply variables compared between CRO and SKY
Supply Inflation4
3CRO +1
Vesting Schedule5
9SKY +4
Circulating / FDV Ratio5
9SKY +4
Buyback and Burn5
4CRO +1

Ownership

Ownership variables compared between CRO and SKY
Smart Money Flows3
5SKY +2
Insider Selling5
6SKY +1
Holder Concentration3
3level

Traction

Traction variables compared between CRO and SKY
TVL Trend3
5SKY +2
Active Users4
4level
Developer Activity4
6SKY +2
Network Growth3
6SKY +3

Position

Position variables compared between CRO and SKY
Market Share3
7SKY +4
Competitive Moat4
6SKY +2
Institutional Adoption5
8SKY +3
Exchange Depth5
4CRO +1
Social Mindshare4
3CRO +1

Risk

Risk variables compared between CRO and SKY
Regulatory Safety5
4CRO +1
Catalyst Calendar3
5SKY +2
BTC Alpha Potential4
3CRO +1
Team Execution5
5level
Treasury Runway5
8SKY +3

Bars read outward from the centre: CRO to the left, SKY to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.

03

Market and supply

Market and supply figures for CRO and SKY
CROSKY
Price$0.0629$0.0795
Market cap$3.12B$1.86B
Circulating49.5%99.9%
Dilution to full supply2.02x1x
Off all-time high-92.9%-21.2%
To recover the high14.1x1.3x
Total value lockednot published$6.02B
NetworkCronosEthereum

Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.

04

Catalyst and risk on each side

CRO · WATCH

Catalyst

Crypto.com exchange user growth and staking rewards from card program and network expansion.

Principal risk

Regulatory scrutiny on exchange operations and tokenomics dilution from high supply inflation.

SKY · CAUTIOUS HOLD

Catalyst

Buyback restoration ~Nov 2026 when Solvency Reserve hits $125M (currently $70.6M). Revenue still growing (Q1 record $61M net). SSR cut improves margins. Remaining 3 Stars. S&P upgrade path. Obex Cohort 2.

Principal risk

Validated RISKS: Rune SPOF (80% governance, emergency proposals bypass process). Net inflationary ~4.4%/yr at current rates. Revenue $246M net but SKY captures only $97M (holders rev). TVL declining. not MiCA-compliant (Jul 2026 deadline). $756M USDC in unverifiable EOA. 35% of USDS is just wrapped USDC. All financials self-reported by Sky Foundation.

05

Common questions

Is CRO or SKY the better investment?
On this framework SKY scores higher: 141 against 102 of 250, and it is rated CAUTIOUS HOLD against WATCH. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and CRO still wins 6 of the 25 individual variables against SKY.
What is the biggest difference between CRO and SKY?
Protocol Revenue. CRO scores 3 of 10 there and SKY scores 8, a gap of 5 points on a single variable.
Which is bigger, CRO or SKY?
CRO is valued at $3.12B and SKY at $1.86B on the latest market snapshot.
06

Related comparisons

Keep reading

Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.