Both on Solana

DRIFT vs JUP

Drift Protocol and Jupiter scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.

Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.

DRIFT score
142/250
29th of 251 · HOLD
JUP score
151/250
19th of 251 · HOLD
Variables won
8 to 11
6 level of 25
Framework prefers
JUP
by 9 points
01

What separates them

DRIFT scores 142 of 250 and ranks 29th of 251. JUP scores 151 and ranks 19th. JUP leads by 9 points, which is inside the range where the individual variables matter more than the total. DRIFT takes 8 of the 25 variables, JUP takes 11, and 6 are level.

2 variables separate them by 3 points or more. DRIFT is clear on Revenue Trend (8 against 4). JUP is clear on Vesting Schedule (7 against 3).

Both score 3 or below on Circulating / FDV Ratio. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.

JUP still has 66.8% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 27.4% for DRIFT. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of JUP is taking the 3.01x dilution path and a buyer of DRIFT the 1.38x one.

JUP is valued at $1.04B against $14.3M for DRIFT, a 73.1x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.

02

All 25 variables, head to head

Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.

Cash flow

Cash flow variables compared between DRIFT and JUP
Protocol Revenue7
6DRIFT +1
Revenue Trend8
4DRIFT +4
P/S Multiple8
6DRIFT +2
Real Staking Yield5
4DRIFT +1

Supply

Supply variables compared between DRIFT and JUP
Supply Inflation4
6JUP +2
Vesting Schedule3
7JUP +4
Circulating / FDV Ratio3
3level
Buyback and Burn5
3DRIFT +2

Ownership

Ownership variables compared between DRIFT and JUP
Smart Money Flows6
6level
Insider Selling5
7JUP +2
Holder Concentration4
3DRIFT +1

Traction

Traction variables compared between DRIFT and JUP
TVL Trend8
7DRIFT +1
Active Users7
8JUP +1
Developer Activity7
7level
Network Growth7
9JUP +2

Position

Position variables compared between DRIFT and JUP
Market Share7
8JUP +1
Competitive Moat6
8JUP +2
Institutional Adoption3
5JUP +2
Exchange Depth3
5JUP +2
Social Mindshare5
7JUP +2

Risk

Risk variables compared between DRIFT and JUP
Regulatory Safety5
5level
Catalyst Calendar8
7DRIFT +1
BTC Alpha Potential5
7JUP +2
Team Execution7
7level
Treasury Runway6
6level

Bars read outward from the centre: DRIFT to the left, JUP to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.

03

Market and supply

Market and supply figures for DRIFT and JUP
DRIFTJUP
Price$0.0197$0.3145
Market cap$14.3M$1.04B
Circulating72.6%33.2%
Dilution to full supply1.38x3.01x
Off all-time high-99.24%-84.3%
To recover the high131.6x6.4x
Total value locked$520.0M$2.94B
NetworkSolanaSolana

Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.

04

Catalyst and risk on each side

DRIFT · HOLD

Catalyst

Relaunch after the 1 April 2026 exploit, no confirmed date

Principal risk

Exploited for $286M on 1 April 2026 via a compromised admin key, deposits and withdrawals suspended. VC vesting Sep 2026 (150M tokens), Solana network risk, competition from Zeta Markets

JUP · HOLD

Catalyst

Net-zero emissions (Feb 2026), Securitize onchain equities live, Jupiter Lend $2B+ TVL, Jupnet omnichain (testnet)

Principal risk

Revenue -78% ($580M→$129M), buyback halted ($70M failed), LIBRA scandal, 72% whale concentration, Jupnet testnet only

05

Common questions

Is DRIFT or JUP the better investment?
On this framework JUP scores higher: 151 against 142 of 250, and it is rated HOLD against HOLD. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and DRIFT still wins 8 of the 25 individual variables against JUP.
What is the biggest difference between DRIFT and JUP?
Revenue Trend. DRIFT scores 8 of 10 there and JUP scores 4, a gap of 4 points on a single variable.
Which is bigger, DRIFT or JUP?
DRIFT is valued at $14.3M and JUP at $1.04B on the latest market snapshot.
06

Related comparisons

Keep reading

Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.