ENA vs GRASS
Ethena and Grass scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
ENA scores 120 of 250 and ranks 68th of 251. GRASS scores 111 and ranks 91st. ENA leads by 9 points, which is inside the range where the individual variables matter more than the total. ENA takes 8 of the 25 variables, GRASS takes 5, and 12 are level.
The framework rates ENA CAUTIOUS HOLD and GRASS WATCH. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.
One variable separates them by 3 points or more. ENA is clear on Institutional Adoption (7 against 4).
Both score 3 or below on Supply Inflation, Vesting Schedule, Buyback and Burn, TVL Trend. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
GRASS still has 30.1% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 10.6% for ENA. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of GRASS is taking the 1.43x dilution path and a buyer of ENA the 1.12x one.
ENA is valued at $3.06B against $457.9M for GRASS, a 6.7x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 6 | 4 | ENA +2 | |
| Revenue Trend | 4 | 5 | GRASS +1 | |
| P/S Multiple | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Real Staking Yield | 5 | 4 | ENA +1 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Vesting Schedule | 2 | 3 | GRASS +1 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Buyback and Burn | 3 | 3 | level |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 7 | 5 | ENA +2 | |
| Insider Selling | 3 | 4 | GRASS +1 | |
| Holder Concentration | 4 | 4 | level |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Active Users | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Developer Activity | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Network Growth | 5 | 5 | level |
Position
| Market Share | 7 | 5 | ENA +2 | |
| Competitive Moat | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Institutional Adoption | 7 | 4 | ENA +3 | |
| Exchange Depth | 7 | 5 | ENA +2 | |
| Social Mindshare | 6 | 6 | level |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 3 | 4 | GRASS +1 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 6 | 5 | ENA +1 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 4 | 5 | GRASS +1 | |
| Team Execution | 6 | 5 | ENA +1 | |
| Treasury Runway | 5 | 5 | level |
Bars read outward from the centre: ENA to the left, GRASS to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| ENA | GRASS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2282 | $0.6539 |
| Market cap | $3.06B | $457.9M |
| Circulating | 89.4% | 69.9% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.12x | 1.43x |
| Off all-time high | -85% | -83.2% |
| To recover the high | 6.7x | 6x |
| Total value locked | $4.20B | not published |
| Network | Ethereum | Ethereum |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
ENA · CAUTIOUS HOLD
Grayscale 13.59% allocation, Arthur Hayes $1.97M investment, BlackRock UStb
S&P 1,250% Basel III risk weight, BaFin ban, only 55% circ, -93% from ATH
GRASS · WATCH
AI data demand driving bandwidth purchases; Grass Layer 2 network launch creating structured data products for AI training
89.2% down from ATH; only 38% circulating with heavy VC/team releases; business model legality of bandwidth resale uncertain
Common questions
- Is ENA or GRASS the better investment?
- On this framework ENA scores higher: 120 against 111 of 250, and it is rated CAUTIOUS HOLD against WATCH. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and ENA still wins 8 of the 25 individual variables against GRASS.
- What is the biggest difference between ENA and GRASS?
- Institutional Adoption. ENA scores 7 of 10 there and GRASS scores 4, a gap of 3 points on a single variable.
- Which is bigger, ENA or GRASS?
- ENA is valued at $3.06B and GRASS at $457.9M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.