ETH vs LINK
Ethereum and Chainlink scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
ETH scores 187 of 250 and ranks 2nd of 251. LINK scores 165 and ranks 11th. ETH leads by 22 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. ETH takes 13 of the 25 variables, LINK takes 8, and 4 are level.
The framework rates ETH HOLD CORE and LINK HOLD. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.
5 variables separate them by 3 points or more. ETH is clear on Vesting Schedule (10 against 4), Supply Inflation (7 against 3) and Circulating / FDV Ratio (10 against 6).
LINK still has 25.2% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 0% for ETH. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of LINK is taking the 1.34x dilution path and a buyer of ETH the 1x one.
ETH is valued at $313.17B against $10.01B for LINK, a 31.3x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.
LINK trades 74.6% below its all-time high and ETH 48.2% below its own. Recovering the high needs 3.9x from LINK and 1.9x from ETH, which is the same statement read as the return each one has to produce.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 9 | 6 | ETH +3 | |
| Revenue Trend | 5 | 7 | LINK +2 | |
| P/S Multiple | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Real Staking Yield | 7 | 5 | ETH +2 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 7 | 3 | ETH +4 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 10 | 4 | ETH +6 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 10 | 6 | ETH +4 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 6 | 4 | ETH +2 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 9 | 8 | ETH +1 | |
| Insider Selling | 7 | 3 | ETH +4 | |
| Holder Concentration | 6 | 4 | ETH +2 |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 6 | 7 | LINK +1 | |
| Active Users | 8 | 7 | ETH +1 | |
| Developer Activity | 7 | 8 | LINK +1 | |
| Network Growth | 8 | 8 | level |
Position
| Market Share | 7 | 8 | LINK +1 | |
| Competitive Moat | 8 | 9 | LINK +1 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 10 | 10 | level | |
| Exchange Depth | 10 | 8 | ETH +2 | |
| Social Mindshare | 6 | 7 | LINK +1 |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 10 | 9 | ETH +1 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 8 | 9 | LINK +1 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Team Execution | 6 | 9 | LINK +3 | |
| Treasury Runway | 8 | 7 | ETH +1 |
Bars read outward from the centre: ETH to the left, LINK to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| ETH | LINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2,564 | $13.37 |
| Market cap | $313.17B | $10.01B |
| Circulating | 100% | 74.8% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1x | 1.34x |
| Off all-time high | -48.2% | -74.6% |
| To recover the high | 1.9x | 3.9x |
| Total value locked | $46.17B | $32.00B |
| Network | Ethereum | Ethereum |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
ETH · HOLD CORE
Glamsterdam ePBS (Q3 2026), CLARITY Act (the 4 July 2026 signing target was missed, the bill stalled in the Senate), staking ETF expansion
Burn collapsed (-71% post-Pectra), ETH/BTC 10mo low, 9 EF departures, identity crisis
LINK · HOLD
DTCC Collateral AppChain July test → Q4 production. CCIP v1.5 self-serve. Confidential Compute GA.
60-76M LINK/yr treasury dumps to Binance ($500M+/yr). Fees go to node ops, not LINK holders.
Common questions
- Is ETH or LINK the better investment?
- On this framework ETH scores higher: 187 against 165 of 250, and it is rated HOLD CORE against HOLD. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and ETH still wins 13 of the 25 individual variables against LINK.
- What is the biggest difference between ETH and LINK?
- Vesting Schedule. ETH scores 10 of 10 there and LINK scores 4, a gap of 6 points on a single variable.
- Which is bigger, ETH or LINK?
- ETH is valued at $313.17B and LINK at $10.01B on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.