FLUX vs QUICK
Flux and QuickSwap scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
FLUX scores 96 of 250 and ranks 161st of 251. QUICK scores 105 and ranks 115th. QUICK leads by 9 points, which is inside the range where the individual variables matter more than the total. FLUX takes 0 of the 25 variables, QUICK takes 9, and 16 are level.
The framework rates FLUX PASS and QUICK WATCH. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.
No single variable separates FLUX and QUICK by as much as 3 points. They are close on the framework's terms, which makes price, liquidity and the supply position below the only grounds for choosing.
Both score 3 or below on Buyback and Burn, Smart Money Flows, Institutional Adoption, Social Mindshare. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
QUICK still has 34.4% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 0% for FLUX. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of QUICK is taking the 1.52x dilution path and a buyer of FLUX the 1x one.
QUICK is valued at $7.0M against $191.3K for FLUX, a 36.8x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 3 | 4 | QUICK +1 | |
| Revenue Trend | 3 | 4 | QUICK +1 | |
| P/S Multiple | 4 | 5 | QUICK +1 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 4 | 4 | level |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 4 | 5 | QUICK +1 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Buyback and Burn | 2 | 3 | QUICK +1 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Insider Selling | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Holder Concentration | 4 | 4 | level |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 3 | 4 | QUICK +1 | |
| Active Users | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Developer Activity | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Network Growth | 4 | 4 | level |
Position
| Market Share | 3 | 4 | QUICK +1 | |
| Competitive Moat | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Institutional Adoption | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Exchange Depth | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Social Mindshare | 3 | 3 | level |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 3 | 4 | QUICK +1 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 3 | 4 | QUICK +1 | |
| Team Execution | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Treasury Runway | 5 | 5 | level |
Bars read outward from the centre: FLUX to the left, QUICK to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| FLUX | QUICK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0324 | $0.0107 |
| Market cap | $191.3K | $7.0M |
| Circulating | 100% | 65.6% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1x | 1.52x |
| Off all-time high | -99.993% | -95.3% |
| To recover the high | 14,286x | 21.3x |
| Total value locked | not published | not published |
| Network | Flux | Polygon |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
FLUX · PASS
Enterprise demand for decentralized cloud compute and GPU rental
Competition from AWS, Akash, and other established cloud providers
QUICK · WATCH
Polygon zkEVM migration and DEX volume growth; QuickSwap's Dragon’s Lair staking boosts yield demand.
Intense DEX competition on Polygon (Uniswap, Balancer); token inflation from staking rewards dilutes holders.
Common questions
- Is FLUX or QUICK the better investment?
- On this framework QUICK scores higher: 105 against 96 of 250, and it is rated WATCH against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and FLUX still wins 0 of the 25 individual variables against QUICK.
- What is the biggest difference between FLUX and QUICK?
- Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
- Which is bigger, FLUX or QUICK?
- FLUX is valued at $191.3K and QUICK at $7.0M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.