MATIC vs QUICK
Polygon (Legacy) and QuickSwap scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
MATIC scores 110 of 250 and ranks 94th of 251. QUICK scores 105 and ranks 115th. MATIC leads by 5 points, which is inside the range where the individual variables matter more than the total. MATIC takes 9 of the 25 variables, QUICK takes 8, and 8 are level.
One variable separates them by 3 points or more. MATIC is clear on Circulating / FDV Ratio (8 against 5).
Both score 3 or below on Buyback and Burn, Smart Money Flows. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
QUICK still has 34.4% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 0% for MATIC. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of QUICK is taking the 1.52x dilution path and a buyer of MATIC the 1x one.
MATIC is valued at $1.08B against $7.0M for QUICK, a 153.9x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Revenue Trend | 3 | 4 | QUICK +1 | |
| P/S Multiple | 4 | 5 | QUICK +1 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 4 | 4 | level |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 7 | 5 | MATIC +2 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 6 | 5 | MATIC +1 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 8 | 5 | MATIC +3 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 2 | 3 | QUICK +1 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Insider Selling | 4 | 5 | QUICK +1 | |
| Holder Concentration | 5 | 4 | MATIC +1 |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Active Users | 5 | 4 | MATIC +1 | |
| Developer Activity | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Network Growth | 4 | 4 | level |
Position
| Market Share | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Competitive Moat | 3 | 4 | QUICK +1 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 5 | 3 | MATIC +2 | |
| Exchange Depth | 6 | 4 | MATIC +2 | |
| Social Mindshare | 4 | 3 | MATIC +1 |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 6 | 5 | MATIC +1 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 3 | 4 | QUICK +1 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 2 | 4 | QUICK +2 | |
| Team Execution | 4 | 5 | QUICK +1 | |
| Treasury Runway | 5 | 5 | level |
Bars read outward from the centre: MATIC to the left, QUICK to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| MATIC | QUICK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1020 | $0.0107 |
| Market cap | $1.08B | $7.0M |
| Circulating | 100% | 65.6% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1x | 1.52x |
| Off all-time high | -92.1% | -95.3% |
| To recover the high | 12.7x | 21.3x |
| Total value locked | $650.0M | not published |
| Network | Polygon | Polygon |
MATIC now trades as POL. The scoring pass ran under the old ticker, so the scores above are filed there while the market figures track the new one.
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
MATIC · WATCH
Full POL migration completion resolving dual-token confusion
Token fully replaced by POL; holding MATIC requires migration action; low liquidity post-transition
QUICK · WATCH
Polygon zkEVM migration and DEX volume growth; QuickSwap's Dragon’s Lair staking boosts yield demand.
Intense DEX competition on Polygon (Uniswap, Balancer); token inflation from staking rewards dilutes holders.
Common questions
- Is MATIC or QUICK the better investment?
- On this framework MATIC scores higher: 110 against 105 of 250, and it is rated WATCH against WATCH. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and MATIC still wins 9 of the 25 individual variables against QUICK.
- What is the biggest difference between MATIC and QUICK?
- Circulating / FDV Ratio. MATIC scores 8 of 10 there and QUICK scores 5, a gap of 3 points on a single variable.
- Which is bigger, MATIC or QUICK?
- MATIC is valued at $1.08B and QUICK at $7.0M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.