JTO vs JUP
Jito and Jupiter scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
JTO scores 134 of 250 and ranks 42nd of 251. JUP scores 151 and ranks 19th. JUP leads by 17 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. JTO takes 5 of the 25 variables, JUP takes 13, and 7 are level.
The framework rates JTO CAUTIOUS HOLD and JUP HOLD. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.
4 variables separate them by 3 points or more. JTO is clear on Circulating / FDV Ratio (6 against 3). JUP is clear on P/S Multiple (6 against 2), Insider Selling (7 against 4) and Network Growth (9 against 6).
Both score 3 or below on Buyback and Burn. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
JUP still has 66.8% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 47% for JTO. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of JUP is taking the 3.01x dilution path and a buyer of JTO the 1.89x one.
JUP is valued at $1.04B against $263.0M for JTO, a 4.0x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 6 | 6 | level | |
| Revenue Trend | 6 | 4 | JTO +2 | |
| P/S Multiple | 2 | 6 | JUP +4 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 6 | 4 | JTO +2 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 5 | 6 | JUP +1 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 5 | 7 | JUP +2 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 6 | 3 | JTO +3 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 3 | 3 | level |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 6 | 6 | level | |
| Insider Selling | 4 | 7 | JUP +3 | |
| Holder Concentration | 4 | 3 | JTO +1 |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 7 | 7 | level | |
| Active Users | 6 | 8 | JUP +2 | |
| Developer Activity | 6 | 7 | JUP +1 | |
| Network Growth | 6 | 9 | JUP +3 |
Position
| Market Share | 6 | 8 | JUP +2 | |
| Competitive Moat | 6 | 8 | JUP +2 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Exchange Depth | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Social Mindshare | 5 | 7 | JUP +2 |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 6 | 5 | JTO +1 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 6 | 7 | JUP +1 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 5 | 7 | JUP +2 | |
| Team Execution | 6 | 7 | JUP +1 | |
| Treasury Runway | 6 | 6 | level |
Bars read outward from the centre: JTO to the left, JUP to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| JTO | JUP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4961 | $0.3145 |
| Market cap | $263.0M | $1.04B |
| Circulating | 53% | 33.2% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.89x | 3.01x |
| Off all-time high | -91.7% | -84.3% |
| To recover the high | 12x | 6.4x |
| Total value locked | $2.80B | $2.94B |
| Network | Solana | Solana |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
JTO · CAUTIOUS HOLD
JTO fee switch enabling staking rewards from MEV tips; Solana network continued growth
No direct revenue accrual to JTO token yet; 91% below ATH; concentrated Solana network risk; a16z large token holder
JUP · HOLD
Net-zero emissions (Feb 2026), Securitize onchain equities live, Jupiter Lend $2B+ TVL, Jupnet omnichain (testnet)
Revenue -78% ($580M→$129M), buyback halted ($70M failed), LIBRA scandal, 72% whale concentration, Jupnet testnet only
Common questions
- Is JTO or JUP the better investment?
- On this framework JUP scores higher: 151 against 134 of 250, and it is rated HOLD against CAUTIOUS HOLD. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and JTO still wins 5 of the 25 individual variables against JUP.
- What is the biggest difference between JTO and JUP?
- P/S Multiple. JTO scores 2 of 10 there and JUP scores 6, a gap of 4 points on a single variable.
- Which is bigger, JTO or JUP?
- JTO is valued at $263.0M and JUP at $1.04B on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.