NEAR vs ZEC
NEAR Protocol and Zcash scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
NEAR scores 135 of 250 and ranks 39th of 251. ZEC scores 101 and ranks 135th. NEAR leads by 34 points, which is a wide enough margin that the framework is not ambivalent. NEAR takes 18 of the 25 variables, ZEC takes 2, and 5 are level.
The framework rates NEAR CAUTIOUS HOLD and ZEC WATCH. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.
5 variables separate them by 3 points or more. NEAR is clear on Network Growth (7 against 3), Regulatory Safety (7 against 3) and Catalyst Calendar (8 against 4).
Both score 3 or below on Protocol Revenue, Buyback and Burn. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
ZEC still has 19.2% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 0% for NEAR. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of ZEC is taking the 1.24x dilution path and a buyer of NEAR the 1x one.
ZEC is valued at $22.59B against $6.64B for NEAR, a 3.4x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Revenue Trend | 6 | 3 | NEAR +3 | |
| P/S Multiple | 5 | 4 | NEAR +1 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 4 | 2 | NEAR +2 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Vesting Schedule | 6 | 6 | level | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 7 | 7 | level | |
| Buyback and Burn | 3 | 2 | NEAR +1 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 5 | 4 | NEAR +1 | |
| Insider Selling | 7 | 4 | NEAR +3 | |
| Holder Concentration | 5 | 4 | NEAR +1 |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 4 | 2 | NEAR +2 | |
| Active Users | 5 | 3 | NEAR +2 | |
| Developer Activity | 8 | 5 | NEAR +3 | |
| Network Growth | 7 | 3 | NEAR +4 |
Position
| Market Share | 5 | 4 | NEAR +1 | |
| Competitive Moat | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Institutional Adoption | 5 | 4 | NEAR +1 | |
| Exchange Depth | 5 | 6 | ZEC +1 | |
| Social Mindshare | 5 | 4 | NEAR +1 |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 7 | 3 | NEAR +4 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 8 | 4 | NEAR +4 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 3 | 5 | ZEC +2 | |
| Team Execution | 6 | 4 | NEAR +2 | |
| Treasury Runway | 6 | 5 | NEAR +1 |
Bars read outward from the centre: NEAR to the left, ZEC to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| NEAR | ZEC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.07 | $1,331 |
| Market cap | $6.64B | $22.59B |
| Circulating | 100% | 80.8% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1x | 1.24x |
| Off all-time high | -75.2% | -58.3% |
| To recover the high | 4x | 2.4x |
| Total value locked | $184.9M | not published |
| Network | NEAR | Zcash |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
NEAR · CAUTIOUS HOLD
nearcore 2.9.0 halving upgrade (max inflation 5%->2.5%), Agent Market 2.0 Q3, Bitwise NEAR Strategy ETF S-1 filed
Chain gas fees ~$2-3.2k/day vs $4.7B mcap; TVL/mcap ratio 4%; buyback crossover still protocol-claimed not audited
ZEC · WATCH
ZEC halving reduced miner emissions; Shielding growth and the Crosslink hybrid finality work led by Shielded Labs, not the Electric Coin Company and shielded transaction growth
Regulatory delistings accelerating; most ZEC transactions are transparent not shielded; Monero preferred by privacy community; ECC funding concerns
Common questions
- Is NEAR or ZEC the better investment?
- On this framework NEAR scores higher: 135 against 101 of 250, and it is rated CAUTIOUS HOLD against WATCH. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and NEAR still wins 18 of the 25 individual variables against ZEC.
- What is the biggest difference between NEAR and ZEC?
- Network Growth. NEAR scores 7 of 10 there and ZEC scores 3, a gap of 4 points on a single variable.
- Which is bigger, NEAR or ZEC?
- NEAR is valued at $6.64B and ZEC at $22.59B on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.