NOT vs VIRTUAL
Notcoin and Virtuals Protocol scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
NOT scores 73 of 250 and ranks 231st of 251. VIRTUAL scores 151 and ranks 19th. VIRTUAL leads by 78 points, which is a wide enough margin that the framework is not ambivalent. NOT takes 0 of the 25 variables, VIRTUAL takes 24, and one is level.
The framework rates NOT PASS and VIRTUAL CAUTIOUS HOLD. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.
5 variables separate them by 3 points or more. VIRTUAL is clear on Protocol Revenue (6 against 1), Revenue Trend (6 against 1) and Network Growth (7 against 2).
VIRTUAL still has 34.2% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 3% for NOT. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of VIRTUAL is taking the 1.52x dilution path and a buyer of NOT the 1.03x one.
VIRTUAL is valued at $502.6M against $45.0M for NOT, a 11.2x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 1 | 6 | VIRTUAL +5 | |
| Revenue Trend | 1 | 6 | VIRTUAL +5 | |
| P/S Multiple | 1 | 5 | VIRTUAL +4 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 1 | 4 | VIRTUAL +3 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 7 | 9 | VIRTUAL +2 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 8 | 9 | VIRTUAL +1 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 9 | 9 | level | |
| Buyback and Burn | 1 | 5 | VIRTUAL +4 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 2 | 6 | VIRTUAL +4 | |
| Insider Selling | 4 | 6 | VIRTUAL +2 | |
| Holder Concentration | 4 | 5 | VIRTUAL +1 |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 1 | 5 | VIRTUAL +4 | |
| Active Users | 3 | 6 | VIRTUAL +3 | |
| Developer Activity | 2 | 6 | VIRTUAL +4 | |
| Network Growth | 2 | 7 | VIRTUAL +5 |
Position
| Market Share | 2 | 6 | VIRTUAL +4 | |
| Competitive Moat | 1 | 5 | VIRTUAL +4 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 1 | 5 | VIRTUAL +4 | |
| Exchange Depth | 5 | 6 | VIRTUAL +1 | |
| Social Mindshare | 5 | 7 | VIRTUAL +2 |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 4 | 5 | VIRTUAL +1 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 2 | 6 | VIRTUAL +4 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 2 | 6 | VIRTUAL +4 | |
| Team Execution | 2 | 6 | VIRTUAL +4 | |
| Treasury Runway | 2 | 5 | VIRTUAL +3 |
Bars read outward from the centre: NOT to the left, VIRTUAL to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| NOT | VIRTUAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000453 | $0.7632 |
| Market cap | $45.0M | $502.6M |
| Circulating | 97% | 65.8% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.03x | 1.52x |
| Off all-time high | -98.4% | -84.9% |
| To recover the high | 62.5x | 6.6x |
| Total value locked | not published | not published |
| Network | TON | Base |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
NOT · PASS
TON network growth; Telegram gaming expansion
All users already rewarded; zero utility post-game; completely dependent on TON/Telegram narrative
VIRTUAL · CAUTIOUS HOLD
Grayscale Q2 2026 consideration list; ERC-8183 co-authored with Ethereum Foundation; Revenue Network ACP scaling; multi-chain expansion to Solana/Arbitrum
Revenue $8.9K/day (96% below peak); protocol retains only 30% of fees; 93% whale concentration; $1M/mo subsidy exceeds $428K/mo fees; top agents (AIXBT, Zerebro) left platform
Common questions
- Is NOT or VIRTUAL the better investment?
- On this framework VIRTUAL scores higher: 151 against 73 of 250, and it is rated CAUTIOUS HOLD against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and NOT still wins 0 of the 25 individual variables against VIRTUAL.
- What is the biggest difference between NOT and VIRTUAL?
- Protocol Revenue. NOT scores 1 of 10 there and VIRTUAL scores 6, a gap of 5 points on a single variable.
- Which is bigger, NOT or VIRTUAL?
- NOT is valued at $45.0M and VIRTUAL at $502.6M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.