PASS

Notcoin (NOT)

Telegram tap-to-earn game token. 100% circulating supply means no open overhang but zero DeFi integration and massive user base already rewarded.

Ranked 231st of 251 rated tokens. Scoring pass 11 Jun 2026.

Score
73/250
231st of 251
Percentile
8.4%
of the rated universe
Circulating
97%
3% of value still to vest
Off all-time high
-98.8%
83.3x to recover
TONTON+15 since last pass
01

What the numbers say

NOT scores 73 of 250 across the 25-variable framework, which places it 231st of 251 rated tokens and inside the bottom 10% of the set. The framework verdict is PASS.

NOT is a top-10 name in the set on one variable. The score rests on Circulating / FDV Ratio 9/10, 10th of 251, Vesting Schedule 8/10, 21st of 251, Supply Inflation 7/10, 26th of 251 and Social Mindshare 5/10, 41st of 251.

Against the same universe, NOT sits in the bottom third on Competitive Moat 1/10, 242nd of 251, Treasury Runway 2/10, 240th of 251, Institutional Adoption 1/10, 238th of 251 and Developer Activity 2/10, 238th of 251. These are the variables that would have to move for the verdict to change.

97% of eventual supply is already circulating, so vesting is not a live risk for NOT. Price has to be justified by demand rather than absorbed against a cliff.

NOT trades 98.8% below its all-time high of $0.0284. Recovering that level is a 83.3x move, not a 98.8% one, which is the arithmetic most drawdown charts hide.

The framework score gained 15 points against the previous pass (58 to 73). Revisions of this size follow a change in the underlying variables, not a change in price.

02

25-variable breakdown

Each variable is scored 1 to 10 and ranked against every other rated token, so a 7 that ranks 20th means something different from a 7 that ranks 180th. The rank is the part that is hard to get anywhere else.

Cash flow

Cash flow variables for NOT, scored 1 to 10 and ranked against 251 tokens
Protocol Revenue
1221st of 251
Revenue Trend
1231st of 251
P/S Multiple
1234th of 251
Real Staking Yield
1226th of 251

Supply

Supply variables for NOT, scored 1 to 10 and ranked against 251 tokens
Supply Inflation
726th of 251
Vesting Schedule
821st of 251
Circulating / FDV Ratio
910th of 251
Buyback and Burn
1205th of 251

Ownership

Ownership variables for NOT, scored 1 to 10 and ranked against 251 tokens
Smart Money Flows
2217th of 251
Insider Selling
4151st of 251
Holder Concentration
458th of 251

Traction

Traction variables for NOT, scored 1 to 10 and ranked against 251 tokens
TVL Trend
1229th of 251
Active Users
3149th of 251
Developer Activity
2238th of 251
Network Growth
2215th of 251

Position

Position variables for NOT, scored 1 to 10 and ranked against 251 tokens
Market Share
2203rd of 251
Competitive Moat
1242nd of 251
Institutional Adoption
1238th of 251
Exchange Depth
573rd of 251
Social Mindshare
541st of 251

Risk

Risk variables for NOT, scored 1 to 10 and ranked against 251 tokens
Regulatory Safety
4213th of 251
Catalyst Calendar
2222nd of 251
BTC Alpha Potential
2200th of 251
Team Execution
2230th of 251
Treasury Runway
2240th of 251

The vertical tick on each bar marks the median score across all 251 rated tokens, so a bar ending left of the tick is below the universe on that variable.

03

Catalyst and risk

Next catalyst

TON network growth; Telegram gaming expansion

Principal risk

All users already rewarded; zero utility post-game; completely dependent on TON/Telegram narrative

04

Market and supply

Price$0.000353
Market cap$35.1Mrank 564
All-time high$0.02842 Jun 2024
Circulating supply99,429,405,867
Eventual supply (max supply)102,456,956,843
Dilution to full supply1.03x
Listed onBinance, OKX, Bybit

Price, market cap, supply and all-time high from CoinGecko, fetched 6 Aug 2026. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 11 Jun 2026 and don't move with price.

05

Tokens with a similar profile

These are the closest matches to NOT measured on the shape of all 25 variables after removing overall quality, so what they share is a pattern of strengths and weaknesses rather than a similar size or price.

06

Sources

  • [Open Builders] Notcoin tap-to-earn game on Telegram attracted 35M+ players before token launch
  • [CoinMarketCap] NOT token has 100% circulating supply with no future vesting pressure
  • [CoinGecko] Notcoin listed on major exchanges in May 2024 with immediate decline post-listing
07

Common questions

What is the Early Thunder score for Notcoin (NOT)?
NOT scores 73 out of 250 on the 25-variable framework, ranking 231st of 251 rated tokens (bottom 10%). The framework verdict is PASS.
What are NOT's strongest fundamentals?
NOT ranks highest on Circulating / FDV Ratio 9/10, 10th of 251, Vesting Schedule 8/10, 21st of 251, Supply Inflation 7/10, 26th of 251 and Social Mindshare 5/10, 41st of 251. Ranks are measured against all 251 tokens in the same scoring pass.
What are the weakest parts of the NOT thesis?
NOT scores in the bottom third of the universe on Competitive Moat 1/10, 242nd of 251, Treasury Runway 2/10, 240th of 251, Institutional Adoption 1/10, 238th of 251 and Developer Activity 2/10, 238th of 251. The single risk carried on the scorecard is: All users already rewarded; zero utility post-game; completely dependent on TON/Telegram narrative
How much NOT supply is still to enter circulation?
97% of eventual NOT supply is circulating today, leaving 1.03x the current float still to arrive. At a flat price per token that is 3% of fully diluted value ahead of current holders.
How far is NOT from its all-time high?
NOT trades 98.8% below its all-time high of $0.0284. Returning to that high requires a 83.3x move from the level used in this scoring pass.
Which tokens have a similar profile to NOT?
Measured on the shape of all 25 scored variables rather than on price, the closest matches to NOT are DOGS (62), POPCAT (73), NEIRO (56) and WIF (88). Similarity here means the same pattern of strengths and weaknesses, not a similar market cap.
What is the next catalyst for NOT?
TON network growth; Telegram gaming expansion

Keep reading

Research and analysis, not investment advice. Scores are one framework applied consistently across 251 tokens, not a prediction of price.