OSMO vs RDNT
Osmosis and Radiant Capital scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
OSMO scores 93 of 250 and ranks 177th of 251. RDNT scores 104 and ranks 118th. RDNT leads by 11 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. OSMO takes 4 of the 25 variables, RDNT takes 14, and 7 are level.
The framework rates OSMO PASS and RDNT WATCH. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.
No single variable separates OSMO and RDNT by as much as 3 points. They are close on the framework's terms, which makes price, liquidity and the supply position below the only grounds for choosing.
Both score 3 or below on Buyback and Burn, Market Share, Institutional Adoption. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
OSMO still has 20.9% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 4.2% for RDNT. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of OSMO is taking the 1.26x dilution path and a buyer of RDNT the 1.04x one.
OSMO is valued at $26.6M against $1.0M for RDNT, a 25.9x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 | |
| Revenue Trend | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 | |
| P/S Multiple | 4 | 5 | RDNT +1 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 6 | 5 | OSMO +1 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 2 | 4 | RDNT +2 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 7 | 5 | OSMO +2 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 2 | 3 | RDNT +1 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 | |
| Insider Selling | 5 | 4 | OSMO +1 | |
| Holder Concentration | 4 | 4 | level |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 | |
| Active Users | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 | |
| Developer Activity | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Network Growth | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 |
Position
| Market Share | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Competitive Moat | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Institutional Adoption | 2 | 3 | RDNT +1 | |
| Exchange Depth | 4 | 5 | RDNT +1 | |
| Social Mindshare | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 6 | 5 | OSMO +1 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 3 | 4 | RDNT +1 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 2 | 4 | RDNT +2 | |
| Team Execution | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Treasury Runway | 4 | 4 | level |
Bars read outward from the centre: OSMO to the left, RDNT to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| OSMO | RDNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0336 | $0.000715 |
| Market cap | $26.6M | $1.0M |
| Circulating | 79.1% | 95.8% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.26x | 1.04x |
| Off all-time high | -99.7% | -99.88% |
| To recover the high | 333.3x | 833.3x |
| Total value locked | $72.0M | not published |
| Network | Osmosis | Arbitrum |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
OSMO · PASS
Superfluid staking and concentrated liquidity pools may attract TVL back to Cosmos hub
Token inflation ~25% annually crushes real returns; IBC network losing ground to Solana and L2s
RDNT · WATCH
Omnichain lending expansion across Arbitrum, BSC, and Ethereum; LayerZero integration drives cross-chain TVL.
Smart contract risk from cross-chain bridging; high token emissions and potential for bad debt in volatile markets.
Common questions
- Is OSMO or RDNT the better investment?
- On this framework RDNT scores higher: 104 against 93 of 250, and it is rated WATCH against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and OSMO still wins 4 of the 25 individual variables against RDNT.
- What is the biggest difference between OSMO and RDNT?
- Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
- Which is bigger, OSMO or RDNT?
- OSMO is valued at $26.6M and RDNT at $1.0M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.