Market-cap peers

PEPE vs WLD

Pepe and Worldcoin scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.

Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.

PEPE score
92/250
184th of 251 · PASS
WLD score
89/250
196th of 251 · PASS
Variables won
10 to 12
3 level of 25
Framework prefers
PEPE
by 3 points
01

What separates them

PEPE scores 92 of 250 and ranks 184th of 251. WLD scores 89 and ranks 196th. PEPE leads by 3 points, which is inside the range where the individual variables matter more than the total. PEPE takes 10 of the 25 variables, WLD takes 12, and 3 are level.

5 variables separate them by 3 points or more. PEPE is clear on Circulating / FDV Ratio (8 against 1), Supply Inflation (6 against 1) and Vesting Schedule (6 against 1). WLD is clear on Treasury Runway (7 against 1) and Developer Activity (6 against 1).

Both score 3 or below on Protocol Revenue, Revenue Trend, P/S Multiple, Buyback and Burn, Real Staking Yield, TVL Trend. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.

WLD still has 62% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 0% for PEPE. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of WLD is taking the 2.63x dilution path and a buyer of PEPE the 1x one.

WLD is valued at $1.96B against $1.70B for PEPE, a 1.1x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.

02

All 25 variables, head to head

Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.

Cash flow

Cash flow variables compared between PEPE and WLD
Protocol Revenue1
1level
Revenue Trend1
2WLD +1
P/S Multiple1
1level
Real Staking Yield1
2WLD +1

Supply

Supply variables compared between PEPE and WLD
Supply Inflation6
1PEPE +5
Vesting Schedule6
1PEPE +5
Circulating / FDV Ratio8
1PEPE +7
Buyback and Burn1
1level

Ownership

Ownership variables compared between PEPE and WLD
Smart Money Flows4
5WLD +1
Insider Selling4
2PEPE +2
Holder Concentration4
2PEPE +2

Traction

Traction variables compared between PEPE and WLD
TVL Trend1
2WLD +1
Active Users5
6WLD +1
Developer Activity1
6WLD +5
Network Growth3
6WLD +3

Position

Position variables compared between PEPE and WLD
Market Share7
5PEPE +2
Competitive Moat4
5WLD +1
Institutional Adoption2
4WLD +2
Exchange Depth8
7PEPE +1
Social Mindshare8
6PEPE +2

Risk

Risk variables compared between PEPE and WLD
Regulatory Safety6
2PEPE +4
Catalyst Calendar3
5WLD +2
BTC Alpha Potential5
4PEPE +1
Team Execution1
5WLD +4
Treasury Runway1
7WLD +6

Bars read outward from the centre: PEPE to the left, WLD to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.

03

Market and supply

Market and supply figures for PEPE and WLD
PEPEWLD
Price$0.000004$0.5146
Market cap$1.70B$1.96B
Circulating100%38%
Dilution to full supply1x2.63x
Off all-time high-85.6%-95.6%
To recover the high6.9x22.7x
Total value lockednot publishednot published
NetworkEthereumEthereum

Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.

04

Catalyst and risk on each side

PEPE · PASS

Catalyst

Ethereum bull market amplification; PEPE as ETH meme equivalent to DOGE on BTC; high CEX liquidity

Principal risk

Zero protocol revenue or utility; 6% supply still to open from deployer wallet; pure sentiment asset; rapid drawdowns in risk-off environments

WLD · PASS

Catalyst

World App user growth; WLD as identity layer for AI agent verification

Principal risk

Only 16.5% circulating with huge team/investor releases; biometric data privacy lawsuits in EU/Korea; zero protocol revenue; FDV ~$3.1B

05

Common questions

Is PEPE or WLD the better investment?
On this framework PEPE scores higher: 92 against 89 of 250, and it is rated PASS against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and PEPE still wins 10 of the 25 individual variables against WLD.
What is the biggest difference between PEPE and WLD?
Circulating / FDV Ratio. PEPE scores 8 of 10 there and WLD scores 1, a gap of 7 points on a single variable.
Which is bigger, PEPE or WLD?
PEPE is valued at $1.70B and WLD at $1.96B on the latest market snapshot.
06

Related comparisons

Keep reading

Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.