Market-cap peers

WSTETH vs XLM

Wrapped Lido Staked ETH and Stellar scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.

Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.

WSTETH score
185/250
3rd of 251 · HOLD CORE
XLM score
108/250
100th of 251 · WATCH
Variables won
23 to 0
2 level of 25
Framework prefers
WSTETH
by 77 points
01

What separates them

WSTETH scores 185 of 250 and ranks 3rd of 251. XLM scores 108 and ranks 100th. WSTETH leads by 77 points, which is a wide enough margin that the framework is not ambivalent. WSTETH takes 23 of the 25 variables, XLM takes 0, and 2 are level.

The framework rates WSTETH HOLD CORE and XLM WATCH. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.

5 variables separate them by 3 points or more. WSTETH is clear on Protocol Revenue (9 against 3), Real Staking Yield (9 against 3) and Revenue Trend (8 against 3).

XLM still has 29.9% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 0% for WSTETH. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of XLM is taking the 1.43x dilution path and a buyer of WSTETH the 1x one.

WSTETH is valued at $11.76B against $7.01B for XLM, a 1.7x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.

XLM trades 77.1% below its all-time high and WSTETH 56% below its own. Recovering the high needs 4.4x from XLM and 2.3x from WSTETH, which is the same statement read as the return each one has to produce.

02

All 25 variables, head to head

Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.

Cash flow

Cash flow variables compared between WSTETH and XLM
Protocol Revenue9
3WSTETH +6
Revenue Trend8
3WSTETH +5
P/S Multiple7
4WSTETH +3
Real Staking Yield9
3WSTETH +6

Supply

Supply variables compared between WSTETH and XLM
Supply Inflation8
5WSTETH +3
Vesting Schedule10
5WSTETH +5
Circulating / FDV Ratio10
5WSTETH +5
Buyback and Burn5
3WSTETH +2

Ownership

Ownership variables compared between WSTETH and XLM
Smart Money Flows9
4WSTETH +5
Insider Selling8
5WSTETH +3
Holder Concentration5
4WSTETH +1

Traction

Traction variables compared between WSTETH and XLM
TVL Trend7
3WSTETH +4
Active Users8
4WSTETH +4
Developer Activity7
5WSTETH +2
Network Growth7
4WSTETH +3

Position

Position variables compared between WSTETH and XLM
Market Share8
4WSTETH +4
Competitive Moat8
5WSTETH +3
Institutional Adoption7
5WSTETH +2
Exchange Depth6
6level
Social Mindshare7
4WSTETH +3

Risk

Risk variables compared between WSTETH and XLM
Regulatory Safety6
6level
Catalyst Calendar6
4WSTETH +2
BTC Alpha Potential5
3WSTETH +2
Team Execution7
5WSTETH +2
Treasury Runway8
6WSTETH +2

Bars read outward from the centre: WSTETH to the left, XLM to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.

03

Market and supply

Market and supply figures for WSTETH and XLM
WSTETHXLM
Price$3,193$0.2001
Market cap$11.76B$7.01B
Circulating100%70.1%
Dilution to full supply1x1.43x
Off all-time high-56%-77.1%
To recover the high2.3x4.4x
Total value locked$26.00Bnot published
NetworkEthereumStellar

Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.

04

Catalyst and risk on each side

WSTETH · HOLD CORE

Catalyst

WstETH becoming default collateral across all major lending protocols; MakerDAO, Aave, Spark all natively integrated

Principal risk

Lido centralization risk (about 24% of staked ETH, down from a 32% peak in 2023); Ethereum validator concentration concerns; potential regulatory classification as security

XLM · WATCH

Catalyst

Stellar's cross-border payment partnerships (e.g., MoneyGram); Soroban smart contract adoption, live on mainnet since early 2024.

Principal risk

Slow payment adoption vs. XRP; limited DeFi network; regulatory uncertainty.

05

Common questions

Is WSTETH or XLM the better investment?
On this framework WSTETH scores higher: 185 against 108 of 250, and it is rated HOLD CORE against WATCH. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and WSTETH still wins 23 of the 25 individual variables against XLM.
What is the biggest difference between WSTETH and XLM?
Protocol Revenue. WSTETH scores 9 of 10 there and XLM scores 3, a gap of 6 points on a single variable.
Which is bigger, WSTETH or XLM?
WSTETH is valued at $11.76B and XLM at $7.01B on the latest market snapshot.
06

Related comparisons

Keep reading

Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.