Similar fundamental profile

AAVE vs PENDLE

Aave and Pendle Finance scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.

Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.

AAVE score
156/250
18th of 251 · HOLD
PENDLE score
160/250
13th of 251 · HOLD
Variables won
10 to 13
2 level of 25
Framework prefers
PENDLE
by 4 points
01

What separates them

AAVE scores 156 of 250 and ranks 18th of 251. PENDLE scores 160 and ranks 13th. PENDLE leads by 4 points, which is inside the range where the individual variables matter more than the total. AAVE takes 10 of the 25 variables, PENDLE takes 13, and 2 are level.

4 variables separate them by 3 points or more. AAVE is clear on P/S Multiple (8 against 5) and Circulating / FDV Ratio (9 against 6). PENDLE is clear on Buyback and Burn (9 against 4) and Team Execution (8 against 4).

Both score 3 or below on BTC Alpha Potential. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.

PENDLE still has 38.3% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 3.5% for AAVE. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of PENDLE is taking the 1.62x dilution path and a buyer of AAVE the 1.04x one.

AAVE is valued at $2.65B against $391.5M for PENDLE, a 6.8x difference. The smaller of the two scores higher on fundamentals, which is the disagreement worth understanding before either position is taken.

02

All 25 variables, head to head

Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.

Cash flow

Cash flow variables compared between AAVE and PENDLE
Protocol Revenue7
6AAVE +1
Revenue Trend5
3AAVE +2
P/S Multiple8
5AAVE +3
Real Staking Yield6
7PENDLE +1

Supply

Supply variables compared between AAVE and PENDLE
Supply Inflation9
8AAVE +1
Vesting Schedule9
9level
Circulating / FDV Ratio9
6AAVE +3
Buyback and Burn4
9PENDLE +5

Ownership

Ownership variables compared between AAVE and PENDLE
Smart Money Flows7
6AAVE +1
Insider Selling6
4AAVE +2
Holder Concentration4
5PENDLE +1

Traction

Traction variables compared between AAVE and PENDLE
TVL Trend3
4PENDLE +1
Active Users6
4AAVE +2
Developer Activity4
6PENDLE +2
Network Growth6
7PENDLE +1

Position

Position variables compared between AAVE and PENDLE
Market Share8
9PENDLE +1
Competitive Moat7
9PENDLE +2
Institutional Adoption8
9PENDLE +1
Exchange Depth8
7AAVE +1
Social Mindshare5
5level

Risk

Risk variables compared between AAVE and PENDLE
Regulatory Safety8
6AAVE +2
Catalyst Calendar7
8PENDLE +1
BTC Alpha Potential2
3PENDLE +1
Team Execution4
8PENDLE +4
Treasury Runway6
7PENDLE +1

Bars read outward from the centre: AAVE to the left, PENDLE to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.

03

Market and supply

Market and supply figures for AAVE and PENDLE
AAVEPENDLE
Price$171.60$2.25
Market cap$2.65B$391.5M
Circulating96.5%61.7%
Dilution to full supply1.04x1.62x
Off all-time high-74.1%-70%
To recover the high3.9x3.3x
Total value locked$14.49B$1.17B
NetworkEthereumEthereum

Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.

04

Catalyst and risk on each side

AAVE · HOLD

Catalyst

V4 multi-chain expansion, Grayscale/Bitwise ETF filings, CLARITY Act DeFi safe harbor, Horizon $1B target

Principal risk

KelpDAO bad debt resolution, Morpho $175M raise competitive threat, governance centralization (top 3 = 58% votes)

PENDLE · HOLD

Catalyst

Solana/Hyperliquid/TON chain expansion, Fortune 2026 list, Vietnam IFC delegation, 21Shares ETP (APEN) on SIX, Boros funding rate scaling, KYC Citadels + Shariah, one-click leveraged PTs, RWA $151M growing

Principal risk

Revenue collapsed 87.6% from peak ($4.44M/mo→$552K/mo). TVL -91% from $13.4B. No max supply cap (perpetual 2% inflation). Team holds 15% circ (25.59M), consistently selling ($9.76M cumulative). Ethena 50-75% TVL concentration. Hayes partially exited.

05

Common questions

Is AAVE or PENDLE the better investment?
On this framework PENDLE scores higher: 160 against 156 of 250, and it is rated HOLD against HOLD. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and AAVE still wins 10 of the 25 individual variables against PENDLE.
What is the biggest difference between AAVE and PENDLE?
Buyback and Burn. AAVE scores 4 of 10 there and PENDLE scores 9, a gap of 5 points on a single variable.
Which is bigger, AAVE or PENDLE?
AAVE is valued at $2.65B and PENDLE at $391.5M on the latest market snapshot.
06

Related comparisons

Keep reading

Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.