APT vs OM
Aptos and MANTRA scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
APT scores 116 of 250 and ranks 81st of 251. OM scores 108 and ranks 100th. APT leads by 8 points, which is inside the range where the individual variables matter more than the total. APT takes 15 of the 25 variables, OM takes 4, and 6 are level.
No single variable separates APT and OM by as much as 3 points. The lead is broad rather than concentrated: APT is ahead on 15 of 25 variables by one or two points each, which is what produces the composite gap without any one variable carrying it.
Both score 3 or below on Buyback and Burn, Insider Selling. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
APT still has 58.5% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 34.3% for OM. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of APT is taking the 2.41x dilution path and a buyer of OM the 1.52x one.
APT is valued at $652.3M against $29.1M for OM, a 22.4x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 4 | 3 | APT +1 | |
| Revenue Trend | 5 | 5 | level | |
| P/S Multiple | 4 | 3 | APT +1 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 6 | 5 | APT +1 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 2 | 4 | OM +2 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 2 | 4 | OM +2 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 3 | 4 | OM +1 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 1 | 3 | OM +2 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 6 | 5 | APT +1 | |
| Insider Selling | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Holder Concentration | 4 | 3 | APT +1 |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 6 | 5 | APT +1 | |
| Active Users | 5 | 4 | APT +1 | |
| Developer Activity | 6 | 5 | APT +1 | |
| Network Growth | 6 | 5 | APT +1 |
Position
| Market Share | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Competitive Moat | 5 | 4 | APT +1 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Exchange Depth | 6 | 5 | APT +1 | |
| Social Mindshare | 5 | 5 | level |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 6 | 5 | APT +1 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 6 | 5 | APT +1 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Team Execution | 6 | 5 | APT +1 | |
| Treasury Runway | 6 | 5 | APT +1 |
Bars read outward from the centre: APT to the left, OM to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| APT | OM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.7484 | $0.004423 |
| Market cap | $652.3M | $29.1M |
| Circulating | 41.5% | 65.7% |
| Dilution to full supply | 2.41x | 1.52x |
| Off all-time high | -96.2% | -83.2% |
| To recover the high | 26.3x | 6x |
| Total value locked | $890.0M | not published |
| Network | Aptos | MANTRA |
OM now trades as MANTRA. The scoring pass ran under the old ticker, so the scores above are filed there while the market figures track the new one.
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
APT · WATCH
Microsoft partnership for AI on Aptos; strong Move network crossover with Sui
Only 27% of tokens in circulation; heavy VC and team allocations opening through 2028 create massive sell pressure
OM · WATCH
MANTRA Chain RWA tokenization focus; regulatory compliance and institutional partnerships.
Slow RWA market growth; competition from Ondo, Centrifuge; low liquidity.
Common questions
- Is APT or OM the better investment?
- On this framework APT scores higher: 116 against 108 of 250, and it is rated WATCH against WATCH. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and APT still wins 15 of the 25 individual variables against OM.
- What is the biggest difference between APT and OM?
- Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
- Which is bigger, APT or OM?
- APT is valued at $652.3M and OM at $29.1M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.