MANTRA (OM)
RWA-focused L1. Regulatory-compliant tokenization. Middle East partnerships.
Ranked 100th of 251 rated tokens. Scoring pass 11 Jun 2026.
What the numbers say
OM scores 108 of 250 across the 25-variable framework, which places it 100th of 251 rated tokens and inside the upper half of the set. The framework verdict is WATCH.
The score rests on TVL Trend 5/10, 30th of 251, Revenue Trend 5/10, 32nd of 251, Institutional Adoption 5/10, 36th of 251 and Real Staking Yield 5/10, 37th of 251.
Against the same universe, OM sits in the bottom third on Circulating / FDV Ratio 4/10, 203rd of 251, Insider Selling 3/10, 201st of 251, Holder Concentration 3/10, 197th of 251 and P/S Multiple 3/10, 182nd of 251. These are the variables that would have to move for the verdict to change.
Only 55.2% of OM's maximum supply is in circulation, so 1.81x the current float is still scheduled to arrive. Holding price per token flat while the rest enters circulation implies 44.8% of the fully diluted value sitting ahead of today's holders. That is a real but manageable overhang.
OM is 79.3% off its all-time high of $0.0263, a 4.8x round trip from here.
The framework score gained 108 points against the previous pass (0 to 108). Revisions of this size follow a change in the underlying variables, not a change in price.
25-variable breakdown
Each variable is scored 1 to 10 and ranked against every other rated token, so a 7 that ranks 20th means something different from a 7 that ranks 180th. The rank is the part that is hard to get anywhere else.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 3 | 98th of 251 | |
| Revenue Trend | 5 | 32nd of 251 | |
| P/S Multiple | 3 | 182nd of 251 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 5 | 37th of 251 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 4 | 146th of 251 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 4 | 181st of 251 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 4 | 203rd of 251 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 3 | 63rd of 251 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 5 | 48th of 251 | |
| Insider Selling | 3 | 201st of 251 | |
| Holder Concentration | 3 | 197th of 251 |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 5 | 30th of 251 | |
| Active Users | 4 | 91st of 251 | |
| Developer Activity | 5 | 83rd of 251 | |
| Network Growth | 5 | 52nd of 251 |
Position
| Market Share | 4 | 87th of 251 | |
| Competitive Moat | 4 | 114th of 251 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 5 | 36th of 251 | |
| Exchange Depth | 5 | 73rd of 251 | |
| Social Mindshare | 5 | 41st of 251 |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 5 | 102nd of 251 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 5 | 50th of 251 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 4 | 45th of 251 | |
| Team Execution | 5 | 74th of 251 | |
| Treasury Runway | 5 | 74th of 251 |
The vertical tick on each bar marks the median score across all 251 rated tokens, so a bar ending left of the tick is below the universe on that variable.
Catalyst and risk
Next catalyst
MANTRA Chain RWA tokenization focus; regulatory compliance and institutional partnerships.
Principal risk
Slow RWA market growth; competition from Ondo, Centrifuge; low liquidity.
Market and supply
OM now trades as MANTRA. The scoring pass ran under the old ticker, so the scores below are filed under OM while the market figures track MANTRA.
| Price | $0.005426 |
| Market cap | $30.0Mrank 634 |
| All-time high | $0.02634 Mar 2026 |
| Circulating supply | 5,523,684,281 |
| Eventual supply (max supply) | 10,000,000,000 |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.81x |
| Listed on | Binance, Bybit, KuCoin |
Price, market cap, supply and all-time high from CoinGecko, fetched 6 Aug 2026. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 11 Jun 2026 and don't move with price.
Tokens with a similar profile
These are the closest matches to OM measured on the shape of all 25 variables after removing overall quality, so what they share is a pattern of strengths and weaknesses rather than a similar size or price.
Common questions
- What is the Early Thunder score for MANTRA (OM)?
- OM scores 108 out of 250 on the 25-variable framework, ranking 100th of 251 rated tokens (upper half). The framework verdict is WATCH.
- What are OM's strongest fundamentals?
- OM ranks highest on TVL Trend 5/10, 30th of 251, Revenue Trend 5/10, 32nd of 251, Institutional Adoption 5/10, 36th of 251 and Real Staking Yield 5/10, 37th of 251. Ranks are measured against all 251 tokens in the same scoring pass.
- What are the weakest parts of the OM thesis?
- OM scores in the bottom third of the universe on Circulating / FDV Ratio 4/10, 203rd of 251, Insider Selling 3/10, 201st of 251, Holder Concentration 3/10, 197th of 251 and P/S Multiple 3/10, 182nd of 251. The single risk carried on the scorecard is: Slow RWA market growth; competition from Ondo, Centrifuge; low liquidity.
- How much OM supply is still to enter circulation?
- 55.2% of eventual OM supply is circulating today, leaving 1.81x the current float still to arrive. At a flat price per token that is 44.8% of fully diluted value ahead of current holders.
- How far is OM from its all-time high?
- OM trades 79.3% below its all-time high of $0.0263. Returning to that high requires a 4.8x move from the level used in this scoring pass.
- Which tokens have a similar profile to OM?
- Measured on the shape of all 25 scored variables rather than on price, the closest matches to OM are APT (116), SEI (100), SUI (146) and TIA (120). Similarity here means the same pattern of strengths and weaknesses, not a similar market cap.
- What is the next catalyst for OM?
- MANTRA Chain RWA tokenization focus; regulatory compliance and institutional partnerships.
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. Scores are one framework applied consistently across 251 tokens, not a prediction of price.