Both on Arbitrum

ATH vs VELA

Aethir and Vela Exchange scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.

Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.

ATH score
101/250
135th of 251 · WATCH
VELA score
107/250
106th of 251 · WATCH
Variables won
5 to 9
11 level of 25
Framework prefers
VELA
by 6 points
01

What separates them

ATH scores 101 of 250 and ranks 135th of 251. VELA scores 107 and ranks 106th. VELA leads by 6 points, which is inside the range where the individual variables matter more than the total. ATH takes 5 of the 25 variables, VELA takes 9, and 11 are level.

No single variable separates ATH and VELA by as much as 3 points. They are close on the framework's terms, which makes price, liquidity and the supply position below the only grounds for choosing.

Both score 3 or below on Market Share, Institutional Adoption. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.

02

All 25 variables, head to head

Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.

Cash flow

Cash flow variables compared between ATH and VELA
Protocol Revenue4
4level
Revenue Trend5
5level
P/S Multiple4
5VELA +1
Real Staking Yield3
5VELA +2

Supply

Supply variables compared between ATH and VELA
Supply Inflation4
5VELA +1
Vesting Schedule4
5VELA +1
Circulating / FDV Ratio4
5VELA +1
Buyback and Burn2
4VELA +2

Ownership

Ownership variables compared between ATH and VELA
Smart Money Flows4
4level
Insider Selling4
5VELA +1
Holder Concentration4
4level

Traction

Traction variables compared between ATH and VELA
TVL Trend4
5VELA +1
Active Users4
4level
Developer Activity5
5level
Network Growth5
4ATH +1

Position

Position variables compared between ATH and VELA
Market Share3
3level
Competitive Moat4
4level
Institutional Adoption3
2ATH +1
Exchange Depth4
3ATH +1
Social Mindshare4
3ATH +1

Risk

Risk variables compared between ATH and VELA
Regulatory Safety5
5level
Catalyst Calendar5
4ATH +1
BTC Alpha Potential4
4level
Team Execution5
5level
Treasury Runway4
5VELA +1

Bars read outward from the centre: ATH to the left, VELA to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.

03

Market and supply

Market and supply figures for ATH and VELA
ATHVELA
Price$0.006602not published
Market cap$132.9Mnot published
Circulating47.9%50%
Dilution to full supply2.09x2x
Off all-time high-94.4%n/a
To recover the high17.9xn/a
Total value lockednot publishednot published
NetworkArbitrumArbitrum

Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.

04

Catalyst and risk on each side

ATH · WATCH

Catalyst

Aethir decentralized GPU compute demand from AI and gaming sectors, with enterprise partnerships.

Principal risk

Competition from centralized cloud providers and technical challenges in node network reliability.

VELA · WATCH

Catalyst

Vela Exchange perp DEX on Arbitrum; token buyback and burn mechanism.

Principal risk

Low trading volumes vs. GMX; reliance on Arbitrum network; token dilution.

05

Common questions

Is ATH or VELA the better investment?
On this framework VELA scores higher: 107 against 101 of 250, and it is rated WATCH against WATCH. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and ATH still wins 5 of the 25 individual variables against VELA.
What is the biggest difference between ATH and VELA?
Nothing separates them by more than 2 points on any of the 25 variables, which is unusual and means the two are close substitutes on fundamentals.
06

Related comparisons

Keep reading

Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.