CRV vs LPT
Curve Finance and Livepeer scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
CRV scores 140 of 250 and ranks 32nd of 251. LPT scores 123 and ranks 56th. CRV leads by 17 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. CRV takes 14 of the 25 variables, LPT takes 4, and 7 are level.
The framework rates CRV HOLD and LPT CAUTIOUS HOLD. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.
2 variables separate them by 3 points or more. CRV is clear on Protocol Revenue (8 against 5) and TVL Trend (7 against 4).
Both score 3 or below on Buyback and Burn. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
CRV still has 48.1% of its eventual supply to enter circulation against 0% for LPT. On the same market capitalisation, a buyer of CRV is taking the 1.93x dilution path and a buyer of LPT the 1x one.
CRV is valued at $552.7M against $82.2M for LPT, a 6.7x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 8 | 5 | CRV +3 | |
| Revenue Trend | 6 | 5 | CRV +1 | |
| P/S Multiple | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Real Staking Yield | 6 | 5 | CRV +1 |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Vesting Schedule | 7 | 6 | CRV +1 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 7 | 6 | CRV +1 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 3 | 3 | level |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Insider Selling | 4 | 5 | LPT +1 | |
| Holder Concentration | 4 | 4 | level |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 7 | 4 | CRV +3 | |
| Active Users | 5 | 4 | CRV +1 | |
| Developer Activity | 8 | 6 | CRV +2 | |
| Network Growth | 7 | 5 | CRV +2 |
Position
| Market Share | 7 | 6 | CRV +1 | |
| Competitive Moat | 8 | 6 | CRV +2 | |
| Institutional Adoption | 4 | 4 | level | |
| Exchange Depth | 6 | 5 | CRV +1 | |
| Social Mindshare | 4 | 4 | level |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 5 | 6 | LPT +1 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 6 | 4 | CRV +2 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 2 | 4 | LPT +2 | |
| Team Execution | 5 | 6 | LPT +1 | |
| Treasury Runway | 6 | 5 | CRV +1 |
Bars read outward from the centre: CRV to the left, LPT to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| CRV | LPT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3514 | $1.65 |
| Market cap | $552.7M | $82.2M |
| Circulating | 51.9% | 100% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.93x | 1x |
| Off all-time high | -97.7% | -98.3% |
| To recover the high | 43.5x | 58.8x |
| Total value locked | $3.20B | not published |
| Network | Ethereum | Ethereum |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
CRV · HOLD
Yield Basis mainnet, crvUSD growth, 44% ETH DEX fee revenue share
Egorov liquidated TWICE ($140M+), -96% from ATH, Uniswap V4 competition
LPT · CAUTIOUS HOLD
AI video inference demand on Livepeer network, with 300+ new orchestrators onboarded by April 2025.
Competition from Render Network's video pipeline or AWS MediaConvert capturing 80%+ market share.
Common questions
- Is CRV or LPT the better investment?
- On this framework CRV scores higher: 140 against 123 of 250, and it is rated HOLD against CAUTIOUS HOLD. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and CRV still wins 14 of the 25 individual variables against LPT.
- What is the biggest difference between CRV and LPT?
- Protocol Revenue. CRV scores 8 of 10 there and LPT scores 5, a gap of 3 points on a single variable.
- Which is bigger, CRV or LPT?
- CRV is valued at $552.7M and LPT at $82.2M on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.