ENA vs ICP
Ethena and Internet Computer scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.
Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.
What separates them
ENA scores 120 of 250 and ranks 68th of 251. ICP scores 102 and ranks 129th. ENA leads by 18 points, which is a real gap, though small enough that one variable moving would close much of it. ENA takes 16 of the 25 variables, ICP takes 6, and 3 are level.
The framework rates ENA CAUTIOUS HOLD and ICP WATCH. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.
5 variables separate them by 3 points or more. ENA is clear on Smart Money Flows (7 against 3), Market Share (7 against 3) and Institutional Adoption (7 against 3). ICP is clear on Circulating / FDV Ratio (8 against 4).
Both score 3 or below on Supply Inflation, Vesting Schedule, Buyback and Burn, Insider Selling. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.
ENA is valued at $3.06B against $1.75B for ICP, a 1.7x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.
All 25 variables, head to head
Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.
Cash flow
| Protocol Revenue | 6 | 3 | ENA +3 | |
| Revenue Trend | 4 | 3 | ENA +1 | |
| P/S Multiple | 5 | 3 | ENA +2 | |
| Real Staking Yield | 5 | 5 | level |
Supply
| Supply Inflation | 3 | 2 | ENA +1 | |
| Vesting Schedule | 2 | 3 | ICP +1 | |
| Circulating / FDV Ratio | 4 | 8 | ICP +4 | |
| Buyback and Burn | 3 | 2 | ENA +1 |
Ownership
| Smart Money Flows | 7 | 3 | ENA +4 | |
| Insider Selling | 3 | 3 | level | |
| Holder Concentration | 4 | 3 | ENA +1 |
Traction
| TVL Trend | 3 | 4 | ICP +1 | |
| Active Users | 5 | 4 | ENA +1 | |
| Developer Activity | 5 | 6 | ICP +1 | |
| Network Growth | 5 | 4 | ENA +1 |
Position
| Market Share | 7 | 3 | ENA +4 | |
| Competitive Moat | 5 | 5 | level | |
| Institutional Adoption | 7 | 3 | ENA +4 | |
| Exchange Depth | 7 | 6 | ENA +1 | |
| Social Mindshare | 6 | 5 | ENA +1 |
Risk
| Regulatory Safety | 3 | 6 | ICP +3 | |
| Catalyst Calendar | 6 | 5 | ENA +1 | |
| BTC Alpha Potential | 4 | 3 | ENA +1 | |
| Team Execution | 6 | 4 | ENA +2 | |
| Treasury Runway | 5 | 6 | ICP +1 |
Bars read outward from the centre: ENA to the left, ICP to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.
Market and supply
| ENA | ICP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2282 | $3.14 |
| Market cap | $3.06B | $1.75B |
| Circulating | 89.4% | 100% |
| Dilution to full supply | 1.12x | 1x |
| Off all-time high | -85% | -99.55% |
| To recover the high | 6.7x | 222.2x |
| Total value locked | $4.20B | $110.0M |
| Network | Ethereum | Internet Computer |
Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.
Catalyst and risk on each side
ENA · CAUTIOUS HOLD
Grayscale 13.59% allocation, Arthur Hayes $1.97M investment, BlackRock UStb
S&P 1,250% Basel III risk weight, BaFin ban, only 55% circ, -93% from ATH
ICP · WATCH
Bitcoin integration and ckBTC enabling ICP as BTC L2; AI smart contract canister adoption
Ongoing NNS-controlled ICP minting (inflation); 53% supply not yet in circulation; 99.6% below launch price; complex tech with thin real-world adoption
Common questions
- Is ENA or ICP the better investment?
- On this framework ENA scores higher: 120 against 102 of 250, and it is rated CAUTIOUS HOLD against WATCH. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and ENA still wins 16 of the 25 individual variables against ICP.
- What is the biggest difference between ENA and ICP?
- Circulating / FDV Ratio. ENA scores 4 of 10 there and ICP scores 8, a gap of 4 points on a single variable.
- Which is bigger, ENA or ICP?
- ENA is valued at $3.06B and ICP at $1.75B on the latest market snapshot.
Related comparisons
Keep reading
Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.