Market-cap peers

ENA vs PEPE

Ethena and Pepe scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.

Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.

ENA score
120/250
68th of 251 · CAUTIOUS HOLD
PEPE score
92/250
184th of 251 · PASS
Variables won
14 to 8
3 level of 25
Framework prefers
ENA
by 28 points
01

What separates them

ENA scores 120 of 250 and ranks 68th of 251. PEPE scores 92 and ranks 184th. ENA leads by 28 points, which is a wide enough margin that the framework is not ambivalent. ENA takes 14 of the 25 variables, PEPE takes 8, and 3 are level.

The framework rates ENA CAUTIOUS HOLD and PEPE PASS. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.

5 variables separate them by 3 points or more. ENA is clear on Protocol Revenue (6 against 1), Institutional Adoption (7 against 2) and Team Execution (6 against 1). PEPE is clear on Vesting Schedule (6 against 2).

Both score 3 or below on Buyback and Burn, TVL Trend. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.

ENA is valued at $3.06B against $1.70B for PEPE, a 1.8x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.

02

All 25 variables, head to head

Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.

Cash flow

Cash flow variables compared between ENA and PEPE
Protocol Revenue6
1ENA +5
Revenue Trend4
1ENA +3
P/S Multiple5
1ENA +4
Real Staking Yield5
1ENA +4

Supply

Supply variables compared between ENA and PEPE
Supply Inflation3
6PEPE +3
Vesting Schedule2
6PEPE +4
Circulating / FDV Ratio4
8PEPE +4
Buyback and Burn3
1ENA +2

Ownership

Ownership variables compared between ENA and PEPE
Smart Money Flows7
4ENA +3
Insider Selling3
4PEPE +1
Holder Concentration4
4level

Traction

Traction variables compared between ENA and PEPE
TVL Trend3
1ENA +2
Active Users5
5level
Developer Activity5
1ENA +4
Network Growth5
3ENA +2

Position

Position variables compared between ENA and PEPE
Market Share7
7level
Competitive Moat5
4ENA +1
Institutional Adoption7
2ENA +5
Exchange Depth7
8PEPE +1
Social Mindshare6
8PEPE +2

Risk

Risk variables compared between ENA and PEPE
Regulatory Safety3
6PEPE +3
Catalyst Calendar6
3ENA +3
BTC Alpha Potential4
5PEPE +1
Team Execution6
1ENA +5
Treasury Runway5
1ENA +4

Bars read outward from the centre: ENA to the left, PEPE to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.

03

Market and supply

Market and supply figures for ENA and PEPE
ENAPEPE
Price$0.2282$0.000004
Market cap$3.06B$1.70B
Circulating89.4%100%
Dilution to full supply1.12x1x
Off all-time high-85%-85.6%
To recover the high6.7x6.9x
Total value locked$4.20Bnot published
NetworkEthereumEthereum

Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.

04

Catalyst and risk on each side

ENA · CAUTIOUS HOLD

Catalyst

Grayscale 13.59% allocation, Arthur Hayes $1.97M investment, BlackRock UStb

Principal risk

S&P 1,250% Basel III risk weight, BaFin ban, only 55% circ, -93% from ATH

PEPE · PASS

Catalyst

Ethereum bull market amplification; PEPE as ETH meme equivalent to DOGE on BTC; high CEX liquidity

Principal risk

Zero protocol revenue or utility; 6% supply still to open from deployer wallet; pure sentiment asset; rapid drawdowns in risk-off environments

05

Common questions

Is ENA or PEPE the better investment?
On this framework ENA scores higher: 120 against 92 of 250, and it is rated CAUTIOUS HOLD against PASS. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and ENA still wins 14 of the 25 individual variables against PEPE.
What is the biggest difference between ENA and PEPE?
Protocol Revenue. ENA scores 6 of 10 there and PEPE scores 1, a gap of 5 points on a single variable.
Which is bigger, ENA or PEPE?
ENA is valued at $3.06B and PEPE at $1.70B on the latest market snapshot.
06

Related comparisons

Keep reading

Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.