Market-cap peers

ICP vs SKY

Internet Computer and Sky (formerly Maker) scored on the same 25 variables, ranked against the same 251 tokens, with every gap between them shown.

Scoring pass 18 Sept 2026. Market snapshot 7 Oct 2026.

ICP score
102/250
129th of 251 · WATCH
SKY score
141/250
30th of 251 · CAUTIOUS HOLD
Variables won
3 to 17
5 level of 25
Framework prefers
SKY
by 39 points
01

What separates them

ICP scores 102 of 250 and ranks 129th of 251. SKY scores 141 and ranks 30th. SKY leads by 39 points, which is a wide enough margin that the framework is not ambivalent. ICP takes 3 of the 25 variables, SKY takes 17, and 5 are level.

The framework rates ICP WATCH and SKY CAUTIOUS HOLD. Two tokens close enough to compare do not have to land in the same band, and where they do not, the divergence table below is where the split comes from.

5 variables separate them by 3 points or more. SKY is clear on Vesting Schedule (9 against 3), Protocol Revenue (8 against 3) and Institutional Adoption (8 against 3).

Both score 3 or below on Supply Inflation, Holder Concentration, BTC Alpha Potential. A weakness both sides share is not a reason to prefer either. It is a reason to check whether the category itself carries the problem.

SKY is valued at $1.86B against $1.75B for ICP, a 1.1x difference. The larger of the two also scores higher, so the market and the framework agree on the ordering here.

ICP trades 99.55% below its all-time high and SKY 21.2% below its own. Recovering the high needs 222.2x from ICP and 1.3x from SKY, which is the same statement read as the return each one has to produce.

02

All 25 variables, head to head

Both tokens were scored by the same framework in the same pass, so the numbers are directly comparable. What a comparison adds over two separate pages is the gap: a 6 against a 6 is a non-event, a 9 against a 3 is the reason to hold one and not the other.

Cash flow

Cash flow variables compared between ICP and SKY
Protocol Revenue3
8SKY +5
Revenue Trend3
7SKY +4
P/S Multiple3
7SKY +4
Real Staking Yield5
6SKY +1

Supply

Supply variables compared between ICP and SKY
Supply Inflation2
3SKY +1
Vesting Schedule3
9SKY +6
Circulating / FDV Ratio8
9SKY +1
Buyback and Burn2
4SKY +2

Ownership

Ownership variables compared between ICP and SKY
Smart Money Flows3
5SKY +2
Insider Selling3
6SKY +3
Holder Concentration3
3level

Traction

Traction variables compared between ICP and SKY
TVL Trend4
5SKY +1
Active Users4
4level
Developer Activity6
6level
Network Growth4
6SKY +2

Position

Position variables compared between ICP and SKY
Market Share3
7SKY +4
Competitive Moat5
6SKY +1
Institutional Adoption3
8SKY +5
Exchange Depth6
4ICP +2
Social Mindshare5
3ICP +2

Risk

Risk variables compared between ICP and SKY
Regulatory Safety6
4ICP +2
Catalyst Calendar5
5level
BTC Alpha Potential3
3level
Team Execution4
5SKY +1
Treasury Runway6
8SKY +2

Bars read outward from the centre: ICP to the left, SKY to the right. The side that leads a variable is filled. Each score is 1 to 10 against the same definition applied to all 251 rated tokens.

03

Market and supply

Market and supply figures for ICP and SKY
ICPSKY
Price$3.14$0.0795
Market cap$1.75B$1.86B
Circulating100%99.9%
Dilution to full supply1x1x
Off all-time high-99.55%-21.2%
To recover the high222.2x1.3x
Total value locked$110.0M$6.02B
NetworkInternet ComputerEthereum

Price, market cap and all-time high from the CoinGecko snapshot fetched 7 Oct 2026. Supply shares are derived from circulating and eventual supply counts, which do not move with price. The 25 scores come from the research pass dated 18 Sept 2026.

04

Catalyst and risk on each side

ICP · WATCH

Catalyst

Bitcoin integration and ckBTC enabling ICP as BTC L2; AI smart contract canister adoption

Principal risk

Ongoing NNS-controlled ICP minting (inflation); 53% supply not yet in circulation; 99.6% below launch price; complex tech with thin real-world adoption

SKY · CAUTIOUS HOLD

Catalyst

Buyback restoration ~Nov 2026 when Solvency Reserve hits $125M (currently $70.6M). Revenue still growing (Q1 record $61M net). SSR cut improves margins. Remaining 3 Stars. S&P upgrade path. Obex Cohort 2.

Principal risk

Validated RISKS: Rune SPOF (80% governance, emergency proposals bypass process). Net inflationary ~4.4%/yr at current rates. Revenue $246M net but SKY captures only $97M (holders rev). TVL declining. not MiCA-compliant (Jul 2026 deadline). $756M USDC in unverifiable EOA. 35% of USDS is just wrapped USDC. All financials self-reported by Sky Foundation.

05

Common questions

Is ICP or SKY the better investment?
On this framework SKY scores higher: 141 against 102 of 250, and it is rated CAUTIOUS HOLD against WATCH. That is a ranking of fundamentals as recorded at the last scoring pass, not a price forecast, and ICP still wins 3 of the 25 individual variables against SKY.
What is the biggest difference between ICP and SKY?
Vesting Schedule. ICP scores 3 of 10 there and SKY scores 9, a gap of 6 points on a single variable.
Which is bigger, ICP or SKY?
ICP is valued at $1.75B and SKY at $1.86B on the latest market snapshot.
06

Related comparisons

Keep reading

Research and analysis, not investment advice. A higher score is one framework applied consistently to 251 tokens, not a prediction that one asset will outperform the other.